-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 115
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[develop] Add analysis task. #643
[develop] Add analysis task. #643
Conversation
dd4363e
to
e934779
Compare
e934779
to
c5cf512
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@danielabdi-noaa These changes look good to me!
In scripts/exregional_run_anal.sh
, I have noted a commented line that looks like it can be safely removed, and left a comment regarding the copying the analysis results to INPUT for model forecast.
@danielabdi-noaa, can we change the j-job and ex-script names to something like *_run_analysis? Thanks! |
@JeffBeck-NOAA @danielabdi-noaa If possible could we go with either analysis or analysis_gsi? We should remove the run_* prefix (see issue #633 ) Thanks! |
@JeffBeck-NOAA @BenjaminBlake-NOAA Ok I will make it "analysis_gsi". |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks good to me!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In general the code looks good.
Please replace all instances of anal
with either analysis
or anl
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@danielabdi-noaa Thanks for addressing my comment to rename the task to analysis_gsi and for addressing Christina's suggestions. Everything looks good to me!
@danielabdi-noaa The These are the tests that seem to constantly fail for those given platforms, so I have kicked off the Jenkins testing on Orion this morning (whatever was ailing Orion yesterday seems to be better now - the testing phase has already started), and once they complete, I will move forward with merging this work into develop. |
@MichaelLueken Thanks for looking into the issues. Maybe we should remove these tests from the list at least until they become reliable enough to yield greens. I excluded some |
@danielabdi-noaa This is a good idea. Hopefully the two verification failures will be corrected by PR #683. The |
@danielabdi-noaa All tests on Orion successfully passed. When the Jenkins tests were kicked off for Orion, it looks like it attempted to kick off Hera tests too, leading to the aborts. Will now merge this work. |
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES:
Add
gsi analysis
task fromRRFS_dev1
.Note that there is no workflow so this PR can not be run independently until then.
However, it did successfully run for both spinup/production cycles in PR #540.
Type of change
TESTS CONDUCTED:
Run CONUS 3km test successfully in PR [develop] Incorporate RRFS_dev1 workflow to SRW and import most tasks #540
DEPENDENCIES:
DOCUMENTATION:
ISSUE:
CHECKLIST
LABELS (optional):
A Code Manager needs to add the following labels to this PR:
CONTRIBUTORS (optional):