Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make PBXObjectReference internal #300

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 18, 2018
Merged

Make PBXObjectReference internal #300

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 18, 2018

Conversation

pepicrft
Copy link
Contributor

@pepicrft pepicrft commented Sep 14, 2018

Resolves #293

Short description 📝

With this change, PBXObjectReference becomes an implementation detail that consumers of the API don't need to know about. The relationships are now defined through objects.

Solution 📦

  • Make PBXObjectReference internal.
  • Make all attributes and methods that were exposing PBXObjectReference internal.
  • Provide a public version for those methods that don't expose PBXObjectReference.
    • In case of PBXObjects those attributes and methods have been moved to the PBXProj, keeping PBXObjects as an internal object. This allows us making changes at that level without affecting the public API.

@pepicrft pepicrft self-assigned this Sep 14, 2018
@pepicrft pepicrft requested review from yonaskolb and a team September 14, 2018 13:55
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 14, 2018

Danger run resulted in 1 message and 1 warning; to find out more, see the checks page.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 14, 2018

Danger run resulted in 1 warning; to find out more, see the checks page.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS

@pepicrft pepicrft changed the title [WIP] Make PBXObjectReference internal Make PBXObjectReference internal Sep 18, 2018
@pepicrft pepicrft merged commit b22c1b8 into master Sep 18, 2018
@pepicrft pepicrft deleted the make-reference-internal branch September 18, 2018 07:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant