feat:Updated OpenAPI spec

[HavenDV]

Created by Github Actions

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Enhanced the JSON serialization process for various models, improving code clarity and maintainability.

• Bug Fixes

  • Removed validation checks during JSON serialization and deserialization for several classes, allowing for more lenient handling of potentially invalid data.

• Refactor

  • Streamlined the serialization logic by assigning serialized content to variables before creating HTTP request content, improving readability and reducing redundancy.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The recent changes primarily focus on streamlining JSON serialization and deserialization processes across various classes in the codebase. This involved the removal of validation checks for several object types during reading and writing, allowing potentially invalid data to be accepted. While these modifications enhance code readability and efficiency, they introduce risks related to data integrity and error handling.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
src/libs/Ollama/Generated/JsonConverters.AnyOf2.g.cs	Removed validation checks for AnyOf<T1, T2> during JSON serialization and deserialization.
src/libs/Ollama/Generated/JsonConverters.CreateModelStatus.g.cs	Eliminated validation checks for CreateModelStatus in serialization and deserialization.
src/libs/Ollama/Generated/JsonConverters.DoneReason.g.cs	Removed validation for DoneReason objects during JSON processing.
src/libs/Ollama/Generated/JsonConverters.PullModelStatus.g.cs	Validation checks for PullModelStatus during reading and writing have been removed.
src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ChatClient.GenerateChatCompletion.g.cs	Refactored serialization of request for better readability in ProcessGenerateChatCompletionResponse.
src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.CompletionsClient.GenerateCompletion.g.cs	Improved readability by extracting serialization logic in ProcessGenerateCompletionResponse.
src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.EmbeddingsClient.GenerateEmbedding.g.cs	Enhanced clarity by refactoring request serialization in ProcessGenerateEmbeddingResponseContent.
src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.CopyModel.g.cs	Streamlined serialization in ProcessCopyModelResponse for better maintainability.
src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.CreateBlob.g.cs	Refactored request serialization in ProcessCreateBlobResponse to boost readability.
src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.CreateModel.g.cs	Enhanced code clarity by isolating JSON serialization in ProcessCreateModelResponse.
src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.DeleteModel.g.cs	Introduced variable for serialized JSON content in ProcessDeleteModelResponse for clarity.
src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.PullModel.g.cs	Improved readability by refactoring serialization in ProcessPullModelResponse.
src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.PushModel.g.cs	Streamlined request serialization in ProcessPushModelResponse for improved clarity.
src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.ShowModelInfo.g.cs	Enhanced code structure in ProcessShowModelInfoResponseContent by isolating serialization logic.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant Server
    Client->>Server: Send request with serialized JSON
    Server->>Server: Deserialize JSON
    alt Valid JSON
        Server->>Server: Process request
        Server->>Client: Send response
    else Invalid JSON
        Server->>Client: Return error (if validation existed)
    end

Loading

🐰 In the meadow, where the data flows,
A rabbit hops with joy, as the code now glows.
Validation gone, it dances in delight,
Accepting all, both wrong and right!
With each change, a joyful cheer,
For clearer paths and no more fear! 🌼

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5cb58bd and 1e2a856.

Files selected for processing (14)

• src/libs/Ollama/Generated/JsonConverters.AnyOf2.g.cs (2 hunks)
• src/libs/Ollama/Generated/JsonConverters.CreateModelStatus.g.cs (2 hunks)
• src/libs/Ollama/Generated/JsonConverters.DoneReason.g.cs (2 hunks)
• src/libs/Ollama/Generated/JsonConverters.PullModelStatus.g.cs (2 hunks)
• src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ChatClient.GenerateChatCompletion.g.cs (1 hunks)
• src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.CompletionsClient.GenerateCompletion.g.cs (1 hunks)
• src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.EmbeddingsClient.GenerateEmbedding.g.cs (1 hunks)
• src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.CopyModel.g.cs (1 hunks)
• src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.CreateBlob.g.cs (1 hunks)
• src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.CreateModel.g.cs (1 hunks)
• src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.DeleteModel.g.cs (1 hunks)
• src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.PullModel.g.cs (1 hunks)
• src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.PushModel.g.cs (1 hunks)
• src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.ShowModelInfo.g.cs (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (10)

• src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ChatClient.GenerateChatCompletion.g.cs
• src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.CompletionsClient.GenerateCompletion.g.cs
• src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.EmbeddingsClient.GenerateEmbedding.g.cs
• src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.CopyModel.g.cs
• src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.CreateBlob.g.cs
• src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.CreateModel.g.cs
• src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.DeleteModel.g.cs
• src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.PullModel.g.cs
• src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.PushModel.g.cs
• src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.ShowModelInfo.g.cs

Additional comments not posted (8)

src/libs/Ollama/Generated/JsonConverters.AnyOf2.g.cs (2)

41-59: Consider reintroducing validation checks in the Read method.

The removal of validation checks for the result object may lead to accepting invalid JSON data, potentially causing issues elsewhere in the application. It's important to verify the impact of this change on data integrity and error handling.

---

Line range hint 61-73:
Reconsider removing validation checks in the Write method.

The absence of validation before serialization might lead to incorrect or malformed data being serialized, potentially causing runtime errors.

src/libs/Ollama/Generated/JsonConverters.DoneReason.g.cs (2)

42-60: Reevaluate the removal of validation checks in the Read method.

The absence of validation checks for the result object may lead to deserializing invalid JSON data, potentially impacting the application's robustness.

---

Line range hint 62-74:
Consider reintroducing validation checks in the Write method.

Removing validation before serialization might result in incorrect or malformed data being serialized, potentially leading to runtime errors.

src/libs/Ollama/Generated/JsonConverters.PullModelStatus.g.cs (2)

Line range hint 62-74:
Reevaluate the removal of validation checks in the Write method.

Removing validation before serialization might result in incorrect or malformed data being serialized, potentially leading to runtime errors.

---

42-60: Reconsider the removal of validation checks in the Read method.

The absence of validation checks for the result object may lead to deserializing invalid JSON data, potentially impacting the application's robustness.

src/libs/Ollama/Generated/JsonConverters.CreateModelStatus.g.cs (2)

60-60: Ensure consistent deserialization logic.

The logic for deserializing value1 and value2 seems to rely on the presence of either value. Ensure that this logic is consistent with the intended behavior of the CreateModelStatus class.

---

42-60: Consider reintroducing validation checks.

The removal of validation checks in the Read method allows potentially invalid data to be processed without raising errors. While this may streamline the process, it introduces risks related to data integrity. Consider implementing a strategy to handle invalid data gracefully, such as logging warnings or errors.