fix: Fix incorrect use of pk_attr instead of db_pk_column when using RelationalField as the primary key #1362
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
When using
RelationalField(pk=True)
without specifyingsource_field
, the value ofmeta.db_pk_column
is the same asmeta.pk_attr
. Theoretically, the value ofmeta.db_pk_column
should bef"{meta.db_pk_column}_id"
.Fix the issue where the
pk
filter condition is not available when usingRelationalField(pk=True)
.Motivation and Context
I would like
meta.db_pk_column
to be recognized correctly when usingRelationalField(pk=True)
.How Has This Been Tested?
Checklist: