Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added multiple worker example to README #43

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 11, 2011
Merged

Conversation

lorensr
Copy link
Contributor

@lorensr lorensr commented May 1, 2011

Is this the correct way of naming workers? Thanks!

tobi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2011
Added multiple worker example to README
@tobi tobi merged commit d9165b9 into tobi:master Aug 11, 2011
@ptyagi16
Copy link

ptyagi16 commented Mar 7, 2013

This actually does not work. The first worker will block the next until it receives a kill (TERM or INT) and then the next one starts. This is not multiple works but running three one after the other. Please remove this incorrect documentation as it will cause people to waste time trying it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants