Revise space-filling designs #307
Labels
feature
a feature request or enhancement
Comments
topepo
pushed a commit
to topepo/dials
that referenced
this issue
Apr 10, 2024
hfrick
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 14, 2024
* initial skeleton * get values * work with values * more roxygen2 and documentation * process file in man/rmd * small updates * some documentation updates * add a uniform design reference * add the existing designs to the function * unit tests * removed remote * added some missing tests * summary of updates for #307 * one argument per line * updated from reviewer feedback * update unit tests * remove comment * tweak wording * remove comment --------- Co-authored-by: ‘topepo’ <‘[email protected]’> Co-authored-by: Hannah Frick <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
We currently make our space-filling designs on-the-fly using functions in
DiceDesign. They use random numbers and don't always produce the best results.This website has compiled designs that have been optimized for varying numbers of parameters and sizes. They are free of charge and I've already scraped them.
I'd like to:
grid_latin_hypercube(), use the Audze-Eglais designs whenever possible (if they are available for the chosen number of parameters and size). Otherwise, do what we've done before.grid_max_min()function to look up the L2 and L1 designs. We might consider moving the default grid in tune to use this. It goes up to 10 parameters so we are probably fine.This is also made me feel that we should adjust the
grid_max_entropy()function to raise the values of the radius and the number of iterations to make them more stable. We could also add atriesargument that will use different random numbers and take the design with the best results.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: