Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature]: Fdroid release per architecture instead of universal #4011

Closed
indrastorms opened this issue Jun 11, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

[Feature]: Fdroid release per architecture instead of universal #4011

indrastorms opened this issue Jun 11, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@indrastorms
Copy link

indrastorms commented Jun 11, 2024

Feature description

FDroid supports per architecture release, so instead of releasing universal apk release apk per architecture.

Additional information

Benefits:

  1. Faster download
  2. Less user space occupied
  3. Less interenet data consumption
@Anonymous2716
Copy link

In addition to that if anyone for any reason needs to use a different supported architecture installation instead of the default architecture this would help.

@RokeJulianLockhart
Copy link

RokeJulianLockhart commented Jun 22, 2024

#4011 (comment)

@indrastorms, why instead, rather than in addition to?

@agnostic-apollo
Copy link
Member

Read the README

https://github.com/termux/termux-app#f-droid

F-Droid does support architecture specific APKs.

#1904

@agnostic-apollo agnostic-apollo closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jun 22, 2024
@agnostic-apollo
Copy link
Member

agnostic-apollo commented Jun 22, 2024

Seems like it does now, but requires different version code schemes.

https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroiddata/-/issues/2809

#4012 (comment) does not seem to have enough bits for 5 different abis, unless release_variant and noop get combined, but that would decrease max possible version codes per variant as pairs wouldn't be possible.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants