%ForInIteratorPrototype% "is never directly accessible to ECMAScript code"

[senocular]

Will the "is never directly accessible to ECMAScript code" language in the spec need to change for intrinsics like this or should they be omitted from the values accessible through getIntrinsic()?

The %ForInIteratorPrototype% object:
...

• is never directly accessible to ECMAScript code.

https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-%foriniteratorprototype%-object

[ljharb]

Anything otherwise inaccessible would need to remain so, so thus one would need to be explicitly excluded. Thanks for the callout.