Is there a chance to support Play 2.2 ?

[indykish]

As Play 2.2 is in RC1, https://www.playframework.com/documentation/2.2.0-RC1/Home
I am wondering if the dependencies be moved to play 2.2 ?

[gakuzzzz]

Hi,

Yes, I will provide Play2.2 support.
However, since the Result class inheritances are thoroughly redesigned in Play2.2,
it difficult to keep same code as before.

so, probably the version of play2.2 support will be bumped.

thanks,

[indykish]

Cool. Thats great to hear. We are anxious to get our hands on it, as we would move to prod. in a month.

[gakuzzzz]

Alright! I'll try on this weekend!

[indykish]

No hurry. we are on 2.1.3 and play-auth works like a charm, so we are ok.

[mbablok]

Hi,

I am joining the waiting group for Play2.2 support.

Thanks!

[indykish]

Is it prime time to use the branch play2.2. I see a tweet that play2.2 was released.
https://www.playframework.com/documentation/2.2.x/Highlights22

[indykish]

I tried this "jp.t2v" %% "play2.auth" % "0.11.0-SNAPSHOT" but it doesn't resolve it. Have you published your 0.11.0-SNAPSHOT ?

[gakuzzzz]

oh, sorry,
would you add https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots into resolvers?

[indykish]

Yup, I have it actually.

https://github.com/indykish/megam_play/blob/master/project/Build.scala

The problem seems to be that you have changed the artifactId to

 "play2-auth" 
 and 
"play2-auth-test" 

The dots(.) are changed to a dash(-)

(as seen in the pic) .

By changing that it works now.

Do you intend to change it ?

[indykish]

Thank you very much for your swift fix. Very much appreciated.

[raulraja]

I have migrated my project to the latest snapshot in order to support 2.2.
Some of my action composition is now based on the new ActionBuilders that rely on a Request[A] while the loggedin method expects an implicit RequestWithAttributes. Is there a new way to get the loggedin object?
Furthermore how does the whole Stackable controller based authorization fit in with the new ActionBuilders and recommended ways to do action composition in Play 2.2?
thx

[gakuzzzz]

I have answered here
t2v/stackable-controller#6 (comment)

thx!

[gakuzzzz]

I have published new SNAPSHOT that contains #53 changes.

Please try it.

[alangalvino]

Hi,

I have tried the SNAPSHOT version with play 2.2.0 in my application and everything is ok!

[gakuzzzz]

Hi,

Thank you for the feedback!!
If there are no problem, I'll publish release version at an early date.

[indykish]

+1 . No problems here too. Ofcourse we use it in a diff. way.

[indykish]

Thank you Manabu Nakamura for your awesome work.

[raulraja]

We are using it here too in 2 different projects. Both still in development
but no problems son far. Great job!
On Oct 8, 2013 4:07 AM, "Manabu Nakamura" [email protected] wrote:

Hi,

Thank you for the feedback!!
If there are no problem, I'll publish release version at an early date.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/47#issuecomment-25860203
.

[gakuzzzz]

thanks more!
I'm glad to hear that!!

[GitsMcGee]

Hi @gakuzzzz. Any update on when you might want to officially planning on releasing 0.11.0?

[gakuzzzz]

Hi @GitsMcGee,

That have block release of 0.11.0 are #54 and #58.
If these issue can resolve without changing play2-auth interface, I want to publish as soon as possible.
If these need interface changing, I want to include the change in 0.11.0.

Now, I think that #54 is not need changing interface.
I am considering abount #58.
If there are good idea of #58, please tell me :)

Since Play2.2.1-RC1 was published, I want to come to a conclusion by this weekend at the latest.

[GitsMcGee]

Thanks @gakuzzzz. Looking forward to trying out the newest version. #58 is a tricky one. I'll try to put some thought into it.

Thanks again for your hard work and an awesome module!

[djonmayer]

Hi.
Is new version here? :-)

[gakuzzzz]

Hi @djonmayer,

Sorry holding of 0.11.0 release.

[GitsMcGee]

Hi @gakuzzzz,

Is there any reason not to use 0.11-SNAPSHOT in production? It seems stable. Are you planning on making any major interface changes or are there any major bugs that are holding up the release? I know you are still waiting on #58, which may require interface changes. I don't see a very easy solution with that ticket, but it seems like a very rare use case, for what that's worth :).

[gakuzzzz]

Hi,

I agree that #58 is rare case.
I publish 0.11.0.

[gakuzzzz]

I have published 0.11.0 just now!
After a few hours, It will be synced on Maven Central.