Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PHP] Fix code example from README. Variable name was missing when using Basic auth. #7777

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 8, 2018

Conversation

alexions
Copy link
Contributor

@alexions alexions commented Mar 7, 2018

Fix code example from README. Variable name was missing when using Basic auth.

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • Ran the shell script under ./bin/ to update Petstore sample so that CIs can verify the change. (For instance, only need to run ./bin/{LANG}-petstore.sh and ./bin/security/{LANG}-petstore.sh if updating the {LANG} (e.g. php, ruby, python, etc) code generator or {LANG} client's mustache templates). Windows batch files can be found in .\bin\windows\.
  • Filed the PR against the correct branch: 3.0.0 branch for changes related to OpenAPI spec 3.0. Default: master.
  • Copied the technical committee to review the pull request if your PR is targeting a particular programming language.

@jebentier (2017/07) @dkarlovi (2017/07) @mandrean (2017/08) @jfastnacht (2017/09) @ackintosh (2017/09)

Description of the PR

In the previous change (link in the description) $config variable was accidentally removed. So the generated README file had incorrect code example when using basic auth.
9ca9887#diff-48c9b5ad08e2cc9e563b3ac9da839117

I have restored variable name and checked the code example after generation.

@alexions
Copy link
Contributor Author

alexions commented Mar 7, 2018

I have no ideas how (and why) fix in the README template broke 12 tests.

@ackintosh
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your contribution!

broken tests

I think this PR has nothing to do with it as other build is failing with same error as well.

PHPUnit seems finished successfully, so it looks good to me ✨

@wing328
Copy link
Contributor

wing328 commented Mar 8, 2018

@alexions thanks for the PR. The failing tests have nothing to do with your PR. Likely something change in the build image (Travis) and we'll need to investigate further.

@ackintosh thanks for reviewing the change.

@wing328 wing328 modified the milestones: Future, v2.4.0 Mar 8, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants