Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EIP-170 related consensus error at Goerli block 5080941 #867

Closed
jlokier opened this issue Oct 19, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #901
Closed

EIP-170 related consensus error at Goerli block 5080941 #867

jlokier opened this issue Oct 19, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #901

Comments

@jlokier
Copy link
Contributor

jlokier commented Oct 19, 2021

On Goerli, sync progress stops at block 5080941. After that point, trace output repeatedly shows Contract code size exceeds EIP170 and gasUsed neq cumulativeGasUsed messages, and does not feed blocks to the database:

TRC 2021-10-01 21:18:12.883+01:00 Persisting blocks                          tid=902365 file=persist_blocks.nim:43 fromBlock=5080897 toBlock=5081088
...
DBG 2021-10-01 21:18:13.270+01:00 Contract code size exceeds EIP170          topics="vm computation" tid=902365 file=computation.nim:236 limit=24577 actual=31411
DBG 2021-10-01 21:18:13.271+01:00 gasUsed neq cumulativeGasUsed              tid=902365 file=process_block.nim:68 block=5080941/0A3537BC5BDFC637349E1C77D9648F2F65E2BF973ABF7956618F854B769DF626 gasUsed=3129669 cumulativeGasUsed=3132615
TRC 2021-10-01 21:18:13.271+01:00 peer disconnected                          tid=902365 file=blockchain_sync.nim:407 peer=<IP:PORT>
  • This issue is already documented starting from Sync to Goerli #687 (comment). It's just copied here just to have its own issue, as there is more than one way to handle this.

  • It's consensus logic bug due to incorrect return data when a CREATE or CREATE2 operation try to make a contract larger than 24 kiB and the caller looks at the RETURNDATA or RETURNDATASIZE.

  • The 24 kiB contract size limit is exceeded as early as block 4394113 (or 4394114, logs are ambiguous), but that's fine. The bug is in RETURNDATA, and the first time that's checked is bblock 5080941.

  • This issue is not related to London fork semantics. The fact it occurs for the first time in the London range (which starts at 5062605) is probably a coincidence.

jlokier added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 9, 2021
…ATA`

This fixes #867 "EIP-170 related consensus error at Goerli block 5080941", and
equivalent on other networks.

There are some other EVM logic changes too: Refactored `writeContract`, how
`RETURNDATA` is handled inside the EVM, and quirks before EIP-2 (Homestead).

This fix allows sync to get past block 5080941 on Goerli, and probably
equivalent on other networks.  Here's a trace at batch 5080897..5081088:

```
TRC 2021-10-01 21:18:12.883+01:00 Persisting blocks                  file=persist_blocks.nim:43 fromBlock=5080897 toBlock=5081088
...
DBG 2021-10-01 21:18:13.270+01:00 Contract code size exceeds EIP170  topics="vm computation" file=computation.nim:236 limit=24577 actual=31411
DBG 2021-10-01 21:18:13.271+01:00 gasUsed neq cumulativeGasUsed      file=process_block.nim:68 block=5080941/0A3537BC5BDFC637349E1C77D9648F2F65E2BF973ABF7956618F854B769DF626 gasUsed=3129669 cumulativeGasUsed=3132615
TRC 2021-10-01 21:18:13.271+01:00 peer disconnected                  file=blockchain_sync.nim:407 peer=<IP:PORT>
```

Although it says "Contract code size" and "gasUsed", this bug is more general
than either contract size or gas.  It's due to incorrect behaviour of EVM
instructions `RETURNDATA` and `RETURNDATASIZE`.

Sometimes when `writeContract` decides to reject writing the contract for any
of several reasons (for example just insufficient gas), the unwritten contract
code was being used as the "return data", and given to the caller.  If the
caller used `RETURNDATA` or `RETURNDATASIZE` ops, those incorrectly reported
the contract code that didn't get written.

EIP-211 (https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-211) describes `RETURNDATA`:
> "`CREATE` and `CREATE2` are considered to return the empty buffer in the
> success case and the failure data in the failure case".

The language is ambiguous.  In fact "failure case" means when the contract uses
`REVERT` to finish.  It doesn't mean other failures like out of gas, EIP-170
limit, EIP-3541, etc.

To be thorough, and to ensure we always do the right thing with real EVMC when
that's finalised, this patch fixes the `RETURNDATA` issue in two places, either
of which make Goerli block 5080941 pass.

`writeContract` and how it is called are refactored to be clearer.  It sets an
error in the usual way if contract writing is rejected.  (Anticipating EVMC
where we'll use different error codes.)

Also this has the change from @jangko 6548ff9 "fixes CREATE/CREATE2's
`returndata` bug", making the caller EVM ignore any data except from `REVERT`.

There are four behaviour changes:

1. On the callee side, it doesn't set `c.outputData` except for `REVERT`.

2. On the caller side, it doesn't read `child.outputData` except for `REVERT`.

3. There was a bug in processing before Homestead fork (EIP-2).  We did not
   match the spec or other implementations; now we do.  When there's
   insufficient gas, before Homestead it's treated as success but with an empty
   contract.

   https://github.com/ethereum/pyethereum/blob/d117c8f3fd93359fc641fd850fa799436f7c43b5/ethereum/processblock.py#L304
   https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/blob/401354976bb4/core/vm/instructions.go#L586

4. The Byzantium check has been removed, as it's unnecessary.

Signed-off-by: Jamie Lokier <[email protected]>
jlokier added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 7, 2021
This fixes #867 "EIP-170 related consensus error at Goerli block 5080941", and
equivalent on other networks.

This combines a change on the EVM-caller side with an EVM-side change from
@jangko 6548ff9 "fixes CREATE/CREATE2's `returndata` bug", making the caller
EVM ignore any data except from `REVERT`.

Either change works by itself.  The reason for both is to ensure we definitely
comply with ambiguous EVMC expectations from either side of that boundary, and
it makes the internal API clearer.

As well as fixing a specific consensus issue, there are some other EVM logic
changes too: Refactored `writeContract`, how `RETURNDATA` is handled inside the
EVM, and changed behaviour with quirks before EIP-2 (Homestead).

The fix allows sync to pass block 5080941 on Goerli, and probably equivalent on
other networks.  Here's a trace at batch 5080897..5081088:

```
TRC 2021-10-01 21:18:12.883+01:00 Persisting blocks                  file=persist_blocks.nim:43 fromBlock=5080897 toBlock=5081088
...
DBG 2021-10-01 21:18:13.270+01:00 Contract code size exceeds EIP170  topics="vm computation" file=computation.nim:236 limit=24577 actual=31411
DBG 2021-10-01 21:18:13.271+01:00 gasUsed neq cumulativeGasUsed      file=process_block.nim:68 block=5080941/0A3537BC5BDFC637349E1C77D9648F2F65E2BF973ABF7956618F854B769DF626 gasUsed=3129669 cumulativeGasUsed=3132615
TRC 2021-10-01 21:18:13.271+01:00 peer disconnected                  file=blockchain_sync.nim:407 peer=<IP:PORT>
```

Although it says "Contract code size" and "gasUsed", this bug is more general
than either contract size or gas.  It's due to incorrect behaviour of EVM
instructions `RETURNDATA` and `RETURNDATASIZE`.

Sometimes when `writeContract` decides to reject writing the contract for any
of several reasons (for example just insufficient gas), the unwritten contract
code was being used as the "return data", and given to the caller.  If the
caller used `RETURNDATA` or `RETURNDATASIZE` ops, those incorrectly reported
the contract code that didn't get written.

EIP-211 (https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-211) describes `RETURNDATA`:
> "`CREATE` and `CREATE2` are considered to return the empty buffer in the
> success case and the failure data in the failure case".

The language is ambiguous.  In fact "failure case" means when the contract uses
`REVERT` to finish.  It doesn't mean other failures like out of gas, EIP-170
limit, EIP-3541, etc.

To be thorough, and to ensure we always do the right thing with real EVMC when
that's finalised, this patch fixes the `RETURNDATA` issue in two places, either
of which make Goerli block 5080941 pass.

`writeContract` has been refactored to be caller, and so has where it's called.
It sets an error in the usual way if contract writing is rejected -- that's
anticipating EVMC, where we'll use different error codes later.

Overall four behaviour changes:

1. On the callee side, it doesn't set `c.outputData` except for `REVERT`.
2. On the caller side, it doesn't read `child.outputData` except for `REVERT`.
3. There was a bug in processing before Homestead fork (EIP-2).  We did not
   match the spec or other implementations; now we do.  When there's
   insufficient gas, before Homestead it's treated as success but with an empty
   contract.

   https://github.com/ethereum/pyethereum/blob/d117c8f3fd93359fc641fd850fa799436f7c43b5/ethereum/processblock.py#L304
   https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/blob/401354976bb4/core/vm/instructions.go#L586

4. The Byzantium check has been removed, as it's unnecessary.

Signed-off-by: Jamie Lokier <[email protected]>
@jangko jangko closed this as completed in 4b89ca3 Dec 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant