PAPER LINK: Sophia: A Scalable Stochastic Second-order Optimizer for Language Model Pre-training
Cut Model Training Cost by 50%? with this all-new simple plug in and play Optimizer: Sophia
Download with pip pip install Sophia-Optimizer
import torch
from torch import nn
from Sophia import SophiaG
class MyModel(nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super(MyModel, self).__init__()
self.fc1 = nn.Linear(784, 128)
self.fc2 = nn.Linear(128, 10)
def forward(self, x):
x = torch.relu(self.fc1(x))
x = self.fc2(x)
return x
#init model loss function and input data
model = MyModel()
loss_function = nn.CrossEntropy()
input_data = ... #input data
#init the optimizer
optimizer = SophiaG(model.parameters(), lr=2e-4, betas=(0.965, 0.99), rho = 0.01, weight_decay=1e-1)
#training loop
for epoch in range(epochs):
for batch in data_loader:
optimizer.zero_grad()
output = model(batch)
loss = loss_function(output, target)
loss.backward()
optimizer.step()
To run training use git clone method
navigate to experiments folder
cd Sophia
cd experiments
then run file ```python3 training.py````
and if not then do the following:
from Sophia import DecoupledSophia, trainer
#train model
trainer.train()
#eval the model
eval_results = trainer.evaluate()
print(f"Perplexity: {torch.exp(torch.tensor(eval_results['eval_loss']))}")
Now with training file ready in experiments folder! 🔥🔥🔥
Sophia is an second order clipped stochastic optimization algorithm that uses an inexpensive stochastic estimate of the diagonal of the Hessian as an pre-conditioner and a clipping mechanism to control the worst case update size. It achieves better performance than adam in terms of validation pre-traing loss, total compute, and wall-clock time. By cutting model training cost in half, Sophia can help save millions if not billions of dollars in computational resources.
Sophia achievs the same validation pre training loss with 50% fewer number of steps than Adam
50% less total compute and 50% less wall-clock time
Seamless integration into existing training pipelines -- plug in and play!
No special requirments on model architecture or computing infrastructure
Supports both Hutchinson and Gauss-Newton-Bartlett Hessian Estimators
Initialize parameters: θ1, learning rate {ηt}, hyperparameters λ, β1, β2, ϵ, and estimator choice Estimator ∈ {Hutchinson, Gauss-Newton-Bartlett}
Set m0 = 0, v0 = 0, h1−k = 0
For t = 1 to T do
Compute minibatch loss Lt(θt)
Compute gt = ∇Lt(θt)
mt = β1mt−1 + (1 − β1)gt
If t mod k = 1 then
Compute hˆt = Estimator(θt)
ht = β2ht−k + (1 − β2)hˆt
Else
ht = ht−1
θt = θt − ηtλθt (weight decay)
θt+1 = θt − ηt · clip(mt/ max{ht, ϵ}, ρ)
import torch
class Sophia(torch.optim.Optimizer):
def __init__(self, model, input_data, params, lr=1e-3, betas=(0.9, 0.999), eps=1e-8, weight_decay=0, k=10, estimator="Hutchinson", rho=1):
self.model = model
self.input_data = input_data
defaults = dict(lr=lr, betas=betas, eps=eps, weight_decay=weight_decay, k=k, estimator=estimator, rho=rho)
super(Sophia, self).__init__(params, defaults)
def step(self, closure=None):
loss = None
if closure is not None:
loss = closure()
for group in self.param_groups:
for p in group["params"]:
if p.grad is None:
continue
grad = p.grad.data
if grad.is_sparse:
raise RuntimeError("Sophia does not support sparse gradients")
state = self.state[p]
#state init
if len(state) == 0:
state['step'] = 0
state['m'] = torch.zeros_like(p.data)
state['h'] = torch.zeros_like(p.data)
m, h = state['m'], state['h']
beta1, beta2 = group['betas']
state['step'] += 1
if group['weight_decay'] != 0:
grad = grad.add(group["weight_decau"], p.data)
#update biased first moment estimate
m.mul_(beta1).add_(1 - beta1, grad)
#update hessian estimate
if state['step'] % group['k'] == 1:
if group['estimator'] == "Hutchinson":
hessian_estimate = self.hutchinson(p, grad)
elif group['estimator'] == "Gauss-Newton-Bartlett":
hessian_estimate = self.gauss_newton_bartlett(p, grad)
else:
raise ValueError("Invalid estimator choice")
h.mul_(beta2).add_(1 - beta2, hessian_estimate)
#update params
p.data.add_(-group['lr'] * group['weight_decay'], p.data)
p.data.addcdiv_(-group['lr'], m, h.add(group['eps']).clamp(max=group['rho']))
return loss
def hutchinson(self, p, grad):
u = torch.randn_like(grad)
hessian_vector_product = torch.autograd.grad(grad.dot(u), p, retain_graph=True)[0]
return u * hessian_vector_product
def gauss_newton_bartlett(self, p, grad):
B = len(self.input_data)
logits = [self.model(xb) for xb in self.input_data]
y_hats = [torch.softmax(logit, dim=0) for logit in logits]
g_hat = torch.autograd.grad(sum([self.loss_function(logit, y_hat) for logit, y_hat in zip(logits, y_hats)]) / B, p, retain_graph=True)[0]
return B * g_hat * g_hat
When using the Decoupled Sophia optimizer, it's essential to tune the hyperparameters to achieve the best performance for your specific model and dataset. Here's a guide on how to tune the parameters for the Decoupled Sophia optimizer:
The learning rate is a crucial hyperparameter that controls the step size of the parameter updates during the optimization process. In Decoupled Sophia, the update is written as p.data.addcdiv_(-group['lr'], m, h.add(group['rho'])), which is equivalent to the update in the paper up to a re-parameterization.
Choose the learning rate to be about half the learning rate that you would use for AdamW. Some partial ongoing results indicate that the learning rate can be made even larger, possibly leading to faster convergence. Rho (rho) The rho parameter is used in the update rule to control the Hessian's influence on the parameter updates. It is essential to choose an appropriate value for rho to balance the trade-off between the gradient and the Hessian information.
Consider choosing rho in the range of 0.03 to 0.04. The rho value seems transferable across different model sizes. For example, rho = 0.03 can be used in 125M and 335M Sophia-G models.
The (lr, rho) for 335M Sophia-G is chosen to be (2e-4, 0.03). Though we suspect that the learning rate can be larger, it's essential to experiment with different values to find the best combination for your specific use case.
While the learning rate and rho are the most critical hyperparameters to tune, you may also experiment with other hyperparameters such as betas, weight_decay, and k (the frequency of Hessian updates). However, the default values provided in the optimizer should work well for most cases.
Remember that hyperparameter tuning is an iterative process, and the best values may vary depending on the model architecture and dataset. Don't hesitate to experiment with different combinations and validate the performance on a held-out dataset or using cross-validation.
Feel free to share your findings and experiences during hyperparameter tuning. Your valuable feedback and comments can help improve the optimizer and its usage in various scenarios.
The following roadmap outlines the future development plans for the Sophia optimizer. The roadmap is divided into three stages: short-term, mid-term, and long-term goals.
Ready to train plug in and play file with your own model or Andromeda
Performance improvements: Investigate and implement potential performance improvements to further reduce training time and computational resources -> Decoupled Sophia + heavy metric logging + Implement in Triton and or Jax?
Additional Hessian estimators: Research and implement other Hessian estimators to provide more options for users.
Hyperparameter tuning: Develop a set of recommended hyperparameters for various use cases and model architectures.
Integration with Andromeda model: Train the Andromeda model using the Sophia optimizer and compare its performance with other optimizers.
Sophia optimizer variants: Explore and develop variants of the Sophia optimizer tailored for specific tasks, such as computer vision, multi-modality AI, and natural language processing, and reinforcement learning.
Distributed training: Implement support for distributed training to enable users to train large-scale models using Sophia across multiple devices and nodes.
Automatic hyperparameter tuning: Develop an automatic hyperparameter tuning module to help users find the best hyperparameters for their specific use case.
Training multiple models in parallel: Develop a framework for training multiple models concurrently with different optimizers, allowing users to test and compare the performance of various optimizers, including Sophia, on their specific tasks.
Sophia optimizer for other domains: Adapt the Sophia optimizer for other domains, such as optimization in reinforcement learning, Bayesian optimization, and evolutionary algorithms.
By following this roadmap, we aim to make the Sophia optimizer a powerful and versatile tool for the deep learning community, enabling users to train their models more efficiently and effectively.
The DecoupledSophia optimizer offers several benefits that can help accelerate training speed and improve the flexibility of the optimization process:
Modularity: Decoupling the Hessian estimation from the main optimizer allows users to easily plug in different Hessian estimators without modifying the core optimizer code. This modularity makes it easier to experiment with various Hessian estimation techniques and find the best one for a specific task.
Ease of experimentation: With a decoupled architecture, researchers and practitioners can develop and test new Hessian estimators independently from the optimizer. This can lead to faster innovation and the discovery of more efficient Hessian estimation methods, which can further accelerate training speed.
Customization: Users can create custom Hessian estimators tailored to their specific use cases or model architectures. This customization can potentially lead to better optimization performance and faster training times.
Improved maintainability: Separating the Hessian estimation from the optimizer makes the codebase easier to maintain and understand. This can lead to faster bug fixes and improvements in the optimizer's performance.
By offering these benefits, DecoupledSophia can help users accelerate training speed and improve the overall optimization process. The modular design allows for easy experimentation with different Hessian estimators, which can lead to the discovery of more efficient techniques and ultimately faster training times.