Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: sphinx.util.inspect:Signature.format_annotation_old() #6580

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 13, 2019

Conversation

tk0miya
Copy link
Member

@tk0miya tk0miya commented Jul 13, 2019

Feature or Bugfix

  • Refactoring

Purpose

  • I have a plan to separate format_annotation() methods to independent function.
  • Before the separation, this refactors them to remove meaningless codes.

Note: I tested this locally with py3.5.1, 3.5.2, 3.5.7 and 3.6.9.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 13, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #6580 into 2.0 will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              2.0    #6580      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.79%   83.76%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         266      268       +2     
  Lines       40834    40868      +34     
  Branches     5982     5985       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits        34217    34234      +17     
- Misses       5295     5309      +14     
- Partials     1322     1325       +3
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
sphinx/util/inspect.py 72.43% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
sphinx/__init__.py 73.91% <0%> (ø)
sphinx/make_mode.py 0% <0%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5db23ea...f68dd9c. Read the comment docs.

@tk0miya tk0miya merged commit 57777da into sphinx-doc:2.0 Jul 13, 2019
@tk0miya tk0miya deleted the refactor_inspect branch July 13, 2019 16:51
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 10, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant