-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update test files #28
Update test files #28
Conversation
e26fb3d
to
f66a109
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @jtapia, thanks a lot for this PR! ❤️ I have some comments I'd like to discuss first before approval:
-
Is there any specific reason to support Solidus v1.3 and lower? And even if there's a need for that, I think that change is out of this PR's scope (given its title), what do you think?
-
I'm ok with moving the specs under a
spree
folder, but I don't know if that's what we want given thatsolidus_auth_devise
does not follow this convention; maybe @kennyadsl, @jacobherrington or @tvdeyen can shed some light on this -
I don't know if the new file structure is something we want —for sure the updated Rakefile is needed, but I don't feel the same about the
support
folder, considering several Solidus extensions are using Solidus Support helpers already, and they include most of the stuff needed to run the specs
Thanks once again, and please, feel free to share your thoughts!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. I am fine with the changes. The files were most likely moved to reflect the folder structure of the files under test. Some text editor extensions have plugins that help to switch from test to implementation. For that to work the file structure needs to match.
Also the support folder is a common thing in RSpec. Doesn’t have to do anything with Solidus support IMO.
Hi @aitbw, thanks for your comments, I considered the original support versions, but if you think that we should only support from 2.X, I can do the change |
I'm fine with the changes as well, but I think we should only take into account supported versions (2.4+) and try to use |
4269be8
to
91c4807
Compare
@jtapia I think you also have to update the travis matrix and remove the |
5297104
to
414514c
Compare
@kennyadsl done |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jtapia thanks for the PR! I left some comments and I would also ask you to clean commits up a little bit. Maybe some of them could be grouped together?
d1ecaf9
to
5236c42
Compare
5236c42
to
5ca40a5
Compare
@kennyadsl I grouped some commits, let me know if you need any other change |
0390c73
to
78dbd79
Compare
@kennyadsl I made this change https://github.com/solidusio-contrib/solidus_static_content/pull/28/files#diff-93830fa29d616f7c87903d08b5b1b29aR12 and remove all the extra files that now is provided by |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, last question and we are good to go!
78dbd79
to
bcbc24b
Compare
@kennyadsl I tackled the latest comments, let me know what do you think, thanks |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
791c4d8
to
408fbcc
Compare
408fbcc
to
3b07226
Compare
No description provided.