Remove Endangered Languages list #936
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I believe that RichardLitt/endangered-languages _is_ an awesome list. However, it does not match the stipulations set in sindresorhus#926 as to what an awesome list should look like. For instance, I use GitHub descriptions instead of other descriptions for repositories. I also include everything I can, because that is the point of the list - we use stars to show what is popular, which is a metric of awesome contents, as opposed to having only awesome contents. I do not want to change the whole list to match the awesome-styleguides, as that would be arduous and I am not convinced it would improve the point of the list. I have written about this list elsewhere, and I would like to keep it as it is currently formatted, although I agree that it would be great if it were better in places. However, I'll get to that when I get to it. For now, I am making this PR to suggest that the list be removed. I'd rather it was not, but I'm trying to be respectful of @sindresorhus's wishes for list standards.
|
I agree with you on that. It is an awesome list, but as it is the collection of everything, I think that it kind of is out of scope of the content posted here. |
|
Makes sense. @RichardLitt Could you add it to the wiki at least? https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome/wiki |
|
@sindresorhus Done. :) |
RichardLitt
added a commit
to RichardLitt/low-resource-languages
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 9, 2017
26 tasks
moebiusmania
pushed a commit
to moebiusmania/awesome
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 21, 2017
parinck
pushed a commit
to parinck/awesome
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 23, 2017
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I believe that RichardLitt/endangered-languages is an awesome list. However, it does not match
the stipulations set in #926 as to what an awesome
list should look like. For instance, I use GitHub descriptions instead of other descriptions for
repositories. I also include everything I can, because that is the point of the list - we use
stars to show what is popular, which is a metric of awesome contents, as opposed to having only
awesome contents. I do not want to change the whole list to match the awesome-styleguides, as that
would be arduous and I am not convinced it would improve the point of the list.
I have written about this list elsewhere, and I would like to keep it as it is currently formatted,
although I agree that it would be great if it were better in places. However, I'll get to that
when I get to it. For now, I am making this PR to suggest that the list be removed. I'd rather it
was not, but I'm trying to be respectful of @sindresorhus's wishes for list standards.