Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Python Scientific Audio #930

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 6, 2017
Merged

Conversation

faroit
Copy link
Contributor

@faroit faroit commented Apr 5, 2017

awesome-python-scientific-audio

The aim of this repository is to create a comprehensive, curated list of python software/tools related and used for scientific research in audio/music applications.

By submitting this pull request I confirm I've read and complied with the below requirements.

Please read it multiple times. I spent a lot of time on these guidelines and most people miss a lot.

  • I have read and understood the contribution guidelines and the instructions for creating a list.
  • This pull request has a descriptive title.
    For example, Add Name of List, not Update readme.md or Add awesome list.
  • The entry in the Awesome list should:
    • Include a short description about the list project/theme. It should not describe the list itself.
      Example: - [Fish](…) - User-friendly shell.
    • Be added at the bottom of the appropriate category.
  • The list I'm submitting complies with these requirements:
    • Has been around for at least 30 days.
      That means 30 days from either the first real commit or when it was open-sourced. Whatever is most recent.
    • It's the result of hard work and the best I could possibly produce.
    • Non-generated Markdown file in a GitHub repo.
    • The repo should have the following GitHub topics set: awesome-list, awesome, list. I encourage you to add more relevant topics.
    • Not a duplicate.
    • Includes a succinct description of the project/theme at the top of the readme. (Example)
    • Only has awesome items. Awesome lists are curations of the best, not everything.
    • Includes a project logo/illustration whenever possible.
      • Placed at the top-right of the readme. (Example)
      • The image should link to the project website or any relevant website.
      • The image should be high-DPI. Set it to maximum half the width of the original image.
    • Entries have a description, unless the title is descriptive enough by itself. It rarely is though.
    • Has the Awesome badge on the right side of the list heading,
    • Has a Table of Contents section.
      • Should be named Contents, not Table of Contents.
      • Should be the first section in the list.
    • Has an appropriate license.
      • That means something like CC0, not a code licence like MIT, BSD, Apache, etc.
      • If you use a license badge, it should be SVG, not PNG.
    • Has contribution guidelines.
      • The file should be named contributing.md. Casing is up to you.
    • Has consistent formatting and proper spelling/grammar.
      • Each link description starts with an uppercase character and ends with a period.
        Example: - [AVA](…) - JavaScript test runner.
      • Drop all the A / An prefixes in the descriptions.
      • Consistent naming. For example, Node.js, not NodeJS or node.js.
    • Doesn't include a Travis badge.
      You can still use Travis for list linting, but the badge has no value in the readme.
  • Go to the top and read it again.

@sindresorhus
Copy link
Owner

Please read it multiple times. I spent a lot of time on these guidelines and most people miss a lot.

⬆️

@faroit
Copy link
Contributor Author

faroit commented Apr 5, 2017

sorry, I've read it again, changed a few minor things and marked all guideline items that I completed in my description above.

@faroit faroit changed the title Add "Scientific Audio" Add Scientific Audio Apr 5, 2017
@sindresorhus sindresorhus changed the title Add Scientific Audio Add Python Scientific Audio Apr 23, 2017
@sindresorhus
Copy link
Owner

The Awesome Criteria section should be in CONTRIBUTING.md

And the Related lists should be at the bottom, above Contributing.

License should be a top level section, not under Contributing.


Each link description starts with an uppercase character and ends with a period.
Example: - AVA - JavaScript test runner.

Not followed.


c++ => C++

c => C

python => Python


The Tutorials - Books section should be split in two. Each item should have a description.

Links like https://github.com/spatialaudio/selected-topics-in-audio-signal-processing-exercises are not good. It should have a title and description.


Highly recommended 👍, should say why it's highly recommended.

Excellent Book, look for the Tutorial notebooks, should say why it's excellent.


PyAU² ⚠️ Not maintained - Python Audio Unit Host

Don't include unmaintained stuff. Unmaintained is definitely not awesome.


I would like to see more non-library resources. YouTube videos/talks, blog posts, more books, etc.


I'd like to see some links to community resources: Stack Overflow tag, IRC, chat, forums, communities, Reddit, etc. Example: https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome-electron#community


Generally, the list needs more work.

@faroit
Copy link
Contributor Author

faroit commented Apr 23, 2017

@sindresorhus thanks for the review. I will work this out.

@sindresorhus
Copy link
Owner

@faroit ping

@faroit
Copy link
Contributor Author

faroit commented Jun 21, 2017

The Awesome Criteria section should be in CONTRIBUTING.md

✔️

And the Related lists should be at the bottom, above Contributing.

✔️

License should be a top level section, not under Contributing.

✔️

Each link description starts with an uppercase character and ends with a period.

✔️ see commit.

c++ => C++
c => C
python => Python

✔️

Highly recommended 👍, should say why it's highly recommended.
Excellent Book, look for the Tutorial notebooks, should say why it's excellent.

I added brief descriptions

Don't include unmaintained stuff. Unmaintained is definitely not awesome.

all of these packages are removed now

I would like to see more non-library resources. YouTube videos/talks, blog posts, more books, etc.

I've added some additional resources, 2 books, 2 papers (one comes with youtube video) more tutorials and link to a slack channel

I'd like to see some links to community resources: Stack Overflow tag, IRC, chat, forums, communities, Reddit, etc. Example: https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome-electron#community

unfortunately the community is not large enough currently. For this people might better off to look for unspecific Python communities.

Generally, the list needs more work.

I think it's more polished now. Tell me what you think. Thanks!

@faroit
Copy link
Contributor Author

faroit commented Jul 5, 2017

@sindresorhus ping

@sindresorhus sindresorhus merged commit 0fb5f07 into sindresorhus:master Jul 6, 2017
@sindresorhus
Copy link
Owner

Added :)

@faroit
Copy link
Contributor Author

faroit commented Jul 6, 2017

👍 thanks for your help and comments!

moebiusmania pushed a commit to moebiusmania/awesome that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2017
parinck pushed a commit to parinck/awesome that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants