Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

capdl: refactor tcb_slots #716

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 1, 2024
Merged

capdl: refactor tcb_slots #716

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 1, 2024

Conversation

corlewis
Copy link
Member

This updates the TCB cap slots in the CapDL specification to match the output of the CapDL-tool. It also provides a new definition to hide these details and improve maintainability.

@corlewis corlewis requested a review from lsf37 February 16, 2024 01:11
@corlewis corlewis self-assigned this Feb 16, 2024
spec/capDL/Types_D.thy Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@lsf37 lsf37 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice. That will also make it easier to adjust those slots in the future.

This updates the TCB cap slots in the CapDL specification to match the
output of the CapDL-tool. It also provides a new definition to hide
these details and improve maintainability.

Signed-off-by: Corey Lewis <[email protected]>
@lsf37
Copy link
Member

lsf37 commented Jun 26, 2024

@corlewis can this be merged or is there something blocking it?

@corlewis
Copy link
Member Author

@corlewis can this be merged or is there something blocking it?

Nothing that I can remember, there was just that question about whether this was the best way or if the CapDL-tool should be adjusted instead. Like you said in the other PR, changes to these slots are infrequent enough that this solution should be fine.

@lsf37 lsf37 merged commit 6956c71 into seL4:master Jul 1, 2024
12 of 13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants