Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove cardinality computation #438

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 15, 2019
Merged

Remove cardinality computation #438

merged 4 commits into from
Nov 15, 2019

Conversation

TuanNguyen27
Copy link
Collaborator

@TuanNguyen27 TuanNguyen27 commented Nov 15, 2019

This will be replaced by a more accurate (albeit approximate) frequency count, such as CountMinSketch. cc @Jauntbox

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 15, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #438 into master will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #438      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.93%   86.92%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         337      337              
  Lines       11100    11096       -4     
  Branches      366      362       -4     
==========================================
- Hits         9650     9645       -5     
- Misses       1450     1451       +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...om/salesforce/op/filters/FeatureDistribution.scala 98.55% <100%> (-0.08%) ⬇️
.../op/features/types/FeatureTypeSparkConverter.scala 98.23% <0%> (-0.89%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ccc1501...1479746. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@Jauntbox Jauntbox left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants