Update backtrace-sys crate to 0.1.36 #71577
Conversation
* Fix an off-by-one error in backtrace-sys * Only explicitly configure debuginfo in rustc-dep-of-std
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Mark-Simulacrum (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit f22dd92 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Caused by a problem in libbacktrace first reported to rust repo in rust-lang/rust#71397, than to backtrac-rs in rust-lang/backtrace-rs#312, fixed in backtrace-rs here: rust-lang/backtrace-rs@b53c52b. Update of backtrace-rs for rustc is here: rust-lang/rust#71577, no yet merged.
|
@bors p=1 |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-azure |
|
📣 Toolstate changed by #71577! Tested on commit d9312a8. 💔 rustc-dev-guide on linux: test-pass → test-fail (cc @JohnTitor @amanjeev @spastorino @mark-i-m). |
Tested on commit rust-lang/rust@d9312a8. Direct link to PR: <rust-lang/rust#71577> 💔 rustc-dev-guide on linux: test-pass → test-fail (cc @JohnTitor @amanjeev @spastorino @mark-i-m).
rust-lang/backtrace-rs@0.3.46...backtrace-sys-0.1.36
Fixes #71397.