Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 12 pull requests #58415

Merged
merged 34 commits into from
Feb 13, 2019
Merged

Rollup of 12 pull requests #58415

merged 34 commits into from
Feb 13, 2019

Conversation

Centril
Copy link
Contributor

@Centril Centril commented Feb 13, 2019

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost

dotdash and others added 30 commits January 21, 2019 19:36
Currently, the panic!() calls directly borrow the value bindings. This
causes those bindings to always be initialized, i.e. they're initialized
even before the values are even compared. This causes noticeable
overhead in what should be a really cheap operation.

By performing a reborrow of the value in the call to panic!(), we allow
LLVM to optimize that code, so that the extra borrow only happens in the
error case.

We could achieve the same result by dereferencing the values passed to
panic!(), as the format machinery borrows them anyway, but this causes
assertions to fail to compile if one of the values is unsized, i.e. it
would be a breaking change.
Examples:

```rust
let next_error_type_a = err
    .iter_chain()
    .filter_map(Error::downcast_ref::<ErrorTypeA>)
    .next();
```

```rust
let source_root_error = err.iter_chain().last();
```

Credit for the ErrorIter goes to Tim Diekmann
https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/aj3lpg/is_an_iterator_impl_over_errorsource_possible/
The Ubuntu keyserver is more reliable than the MIT PGP server, which is
prone to going down. This commit also explicitly uses port 80 on the
keyserver for reasons outlined in rust-lang#57844.
These macros are not required to glue the `core_arch` crate anymore.
Speed up the fast path for assert_eq! and assert_ne!

Currently, the panic!() calls directly borrow the value bindings. This
causes those bindings to always be initialized, i.e. they're initialized
even before the values are even compared. This causes noticeable
overhead in what should be a really cheap operation.

By performing a reborrow of the value in the call to panic!(), we allow
LLVM to optimize that code, so that the extra borrow only happens in the
error case.

We could achieve the same result by dereferencing the values passed to
panic!(), as the format machinery borrows them anyway, but this causes
assertions to fail to compile if one of the values is unsized, i.e. it
would be a breaking change.
…=alexcrichton

Stabilize the time_checked_add feature

Closes rust-lang#55940

Stabilizes `checked_add` and `checked_sub` on `Instant` and `SystemTime`.
…alexcrichton

Stabilize linker-plugin based LTO (aka cross-language LTO)

This PR stabilizes [linker plugin based LTO](rust-lang#49879), also known as "cross-language LTO" because it allows for doing inlining and other optimizations across language boundaries in mixed Rust/C/C++ projects.

As described in the tracking issue, it works by making `rustc` emit LLVM bitcode instead of machine code, the same as `clang` does. A linker with the proper plugin (like LLD) can then run (Thin)LTO across all modules.

The feature has been implemented over a number of pull requests and there are various [codegen](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/codegen/no-dllimport-w-cross-lang-lto.rs) and [run](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/src/test/run-make-fulldeps/cross-lang-lto-clang)-[make](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/src/test/run-make-fulldeps/cross-lang-lto-upstream-rlibs) [tests](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/src/test/run-make-fulldeps/cross-lang-lto) that make sure that it keeps working.

It also works for building big projects like [Firefox](https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=2ce2d5ddcea6fbff790503eac406954e469b2f5d).

The PR makes the feature available under the `-C linker-plugin-lto` flag. As discussed in the tracking issue it is not cross-language specific and also not LLD specific. `-C linker-plugin-lto` is descriptive of what it does. If someone has a better name, let me know `:)`
…stebank

Cleanup: rename node_id_to_type(_opt)

Renames `node_id_to_type(_opt)` to `hir_id_to_type(_opt)`; this makes it clear we are dealing with HIR nodes and their IDs here.

In addition, a drive-by commit removing `ty::item_path::hir_path_str` (as requested by @eddyb).
…rochenkov

allow shorthand syntax for deprecation reason

Fixes rust-lang#48271.

Created based on discussion in rust-lang#56896.
fix str mutating through a ptr derived from &self

Found by Miri: In `get_unchecked_mut` (also used by the checked variants internally) uses `str::as_ptr` to create a mutable reference, but `as_ptr` takes `&self`.  This means the mutable references we return here got created from a shared reference, which violates the shared-references-are-read-only discipline!

For this by using a newly introduced `as_mut_ptr` instead.
…wjasper

Rename rustc_errors dependency in rust 2018 crates

I think this is a better solution than `use rustc_errors as errors` in `lib.rs` and `use crate::errors` in modules.

Related: rust-lang/cargo#5653

cc rust-lang#58099

r? @Centril
impl iter() for dyn Error

Examples:

```rust
let next_error_type_a = err
    .iter()
    .filter_map(Error::downcast_ref::<ErrorTypeA>)
    .next();
```

```rust
let source_root_error = err.iter().last();
```

Credit for the ErrorIter goes to reddit user /u/tdiekmann (Tim Diekmann)
https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/aj3lpg/is_an_iterator_impl_over_errorsource_possible/
…ichton

use Ubuntu keyserver for CloudABI ports

The Ubuntu keyserver is more reliable than the MIT PGP server, which is
prone to going down. This commit also explicitly uses port 80 on the
keyserver for reasons outlined in rust-lang#57844.
…crichton

Remove some dead code from libcore

These macros are not required to glue the `core_arch` crate anymore.
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor Author

Centril commented Feb 13, 2019

@bors r+ p=12

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 13, 2019

📌 Commit 6562c28 has been approved by Centril

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Feb 13, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 13, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 6562c28 with merge 827a141...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2019
Rollup of 12 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #57693 (Doc rewording)
 - #57815 (Speed up the fast path for assert_eq! and assert_ne!)
 - #58034 (Stabilize the time_checked_add feature)
 - #58057 (Stabilize linker-plugin based LTO (aka cross-language LTO))
 - #58137 (Cleanup: rename node_id_to_type(_opt))
 - #58166 (allow shorthand syntax for deprecation reason)
 - #58200 (fix str mutating through a ptr derived from &self)
 - #58273 (Rename rustc_errors dependency in rust 2018 crates)
 - #58289 (impl iter() for dyn Error)
 - #58387 (Disallow `auto` trait alias syntax)
 - #58404 (use Ubuntu keyserver for CloudABI ports)
 - #58405 (Remove some dead code from libcore)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 13, 2019

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: Centril
Pushing 827a141 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Feb 13, 2019
@bors bors merged commit 6562c28 into rust-lang:master Feb 13, 2019
@Centril Centril deleted the rollup branch February 13, 2019 13:47
@Centril Centril added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet