Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 10 pull requests #44676

Closed
wants to merge 33 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

clarfonthey and others added 30 commits September 10, 2017 13:21
This seems to have been undocumented. Mention this where the name is set
(Builder::name) and where the panic could happen (Builder::spawn).

Thread::new is private and I think the builder is the only user where
this matters. A short comment was added to "document" Thread::new too.
After the following conversation in #rust-lang:
```
[14:43:50] <Ixrec> TIL the implementation of from_utf_unchecked is literally just "mem::transmute(x)"
[14:43:59] <Ixrec> no wonder people keep saying transmute is overpowered
[15:15:30] <eddyb> Ixrec: it should be a pointer cast lol
[15:15:46] <eddyb> unless it doesn't let you
[16:50:34] <Ixrec> https://play.rust-lang.org/?gist=d1e6b629ad9ec1baf64ce261c63845e6&version=stable seems like it does let me
[16:52:35] <eddyb> Ixrec: yeah that's the preferred impl
[16:52:46] <eddyb> Ixrec: it just wasn't in 1.0
[16:52:50] <eddyb> IIRC
[16:53:00] <eddyb> (something something fat pointers)
```
Since I already wrote half of the preferred impls in the playground, might as well make an actual PR.
These Region values end up in crate metadata so they should not use NodeId.
This makes sure that we don't introduce strange cases where we have
nodes outside the query system that could break red/green tracking
and it will allow to keep red/green neatly encapsulated within the
DepGraph implementation.
- Don't hash traits in scope as part of HIR hashing any more.
- Some queries returned DefIndexes from other crates.
- Provide a generic way of stably hashing maps (not used everywhere yet).
This commit is yet another attempt to bring down our cycle times by
parallelizing some of the long-and-serial parts of the build, for example
optimizing the libsyntax, librustc, and librustc_driver crate. The hope is that
any perf loss from codegen units is more than made up for with the perf gain
from using multiple codegen units.

The value of 16 codegen units here is pretty arbitrary, it's basically just a
number which hopefully means that the cores are always nice and warm.
…s2, r=nikomatsakis

incr.comp.: Compute fingerprint for all query results.

This PR enables query result fingerprinting in incremental mode. This is an essential piece of infrastructure for red/green tracking. We don't do anything with the fingerprints yet but merging the infrastructure should protect it from bit-rotting and will make it easier to start measuring its performance impact (and thus let us determine if we should switch to a faster hashing algorithm rather sooner than later).

Note, this PR also includes the changes from rust-lang#43887 which I'm therefore closing. No need to re-review the first commit though.

r? @nikomatsakis
Add Cow<str> -> Box<Error> impls.

Considering how impls exist for `String` and `&str`, it makes sense to also add an impl for `Cow<str>` as well.

This would allow converting `String::from_utf8_lossy` directly into a `Box<Error>` or `io::Error` without having to add an extra `into_ownd()`.
Stabilized vec_splice and modified splice tracking issue

This stabilizes the vec_splice (Vec part of splice RFC)
Fixes rust-lang#32310.
… r=steveklabnik

Document thread builder panics for nul bytes in thread names

This seems to have been undocumented. Mention this where the name is set
(Builder::name) and where the panic could happen (Builder::spawn).

Thread::new is private and I think the builder is the only user where
this matters. A short comment was added to "document" Thread::new too.
Replace str's transmute() calls with pointer casts

After the following conversation in #rust-lang:
```
[14:43:50] <Ixrec> TIL the implementation of from_utf_unchecked is literally just "mem::transmute(x)"
[14:43:59] <Ixrec> no wonder people keep saying transmute is overpowered
[15:15:30] <eddyb> Ixrec: it should be a pointer cast lol
[15:15:46] <eddyb> unless it doesn't let you
[16:50:34] <Ixrec> https://play.rust-lang.org/?gist=d1e6b629ad9ec1baf64ce261c63845e6&version=stable seems like it does let me
[16:52:35] <eddyb> Ixrec: yeah that's the preferred impl
[16:52:46] <eddyb> Ixrec: it just wasn't in 1.0
[16:52:50] <eddyb> IIRC
[16:53:00] <eddyb> (something something fat pointers)
```
Since I already wrote half of the preferred impls in the playground, might as well make an actual PR.
…isdreavus

Add more links and put the link character to the left

r? @QuietMisdreavus

And of course, a few screenshots:

<img width="1440" alt="screen shot 2017-09-17 at 22 08 46" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3050060/30524496-44a50208-9bf5-11e7-942e-a3707ba125c3.png">
<img width="1440" alt="screen shot 2017-09-17 at 22 09 47" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3050060/30524502-49068dbc-9bf5-11e7-8e59-ec38664e0e0f.png">
<img width="1440" alt="screen shot 2017-09-17 at 22 10 56" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3050060/30524503-491c8c34-9bf5-11e7-9ce5-f1bd5ef8600b.png">
…eveklabnik

Add Example of `IntoIterator` as Trait Bound to Docs

Part of rust-lang#44600.
ci: Use multiple codegen units on non-dist bots

This commit is yet another attempt to bring down our cycle times by
parallelizing some of the long-and-serial parts of the build, for example
optimizing the libsyntax, librustc, and librustc_driver crate. The hope is that
any perf loss from codegen units is more than made up for with the perf gain
from using multiple codegen units.

The value of 16 codegen units here is pretty arbitrary, it's basically just a
number which hopefully means that the cores are always nice and warm.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS.

cc @GuillaumeGomez

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @eddyb

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r+ p=10

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 18, 2017

📌 Commit 91f3adf has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 18, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 91f3adf with merge 4a8bc8a...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2017
Rollup of 10 pull requests

- Successful merges: #44364, #44466, #44537, #44640, #44651, #44657, #44661, #44668, #44671, #44675
- Failed merges:
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the rollup branch September 18, 2017 16:02
@Centril Centril added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet