Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[beta] backports #126093

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jun 7, 2024
Merged

[beta] backports #126093

merged 12 commits into from
Jun 7, 2024

Conversation

cuviper
Copy link
Member

@cuviper cuviper commented Jun 6, 2024

r? cuviper

Urgau and others added 10 commits June 6, 2024 11:41
in the `invalid_reference_casting` lint, when trying to lint on
bigger memory layout casts.

(cherry picked from commit cd6a0c8)
…s7, r=compiler-errors"

This reverts commit f939d1f, reversing
changes made to 183c706.

(cherry picked from commit 56c135c)
(cherry picked from commit 526090b)
(cherry picked from commit 46b31e6)
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 6, 2024

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

  • Pull requests are usually filed against the master branch for this repo, but this one is against beta. Please double check that you specified the right target!
  • These commits modify submodules.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 6, 2024
@cuviper
Copy link
Member Author

cuviper commented Jun 6, 2024

@bors r+ rollup=never p=1

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 6, 2024

📌 Commit ac45caa has been approved by cuviper

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 6, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
[beta] backports

- Fix insufficient logic when searching for the underlying allocation rust-lang#124761
- Handle field projections like slice indexing in invalid_reference_casting rust-lang#124908
- Handle Deref expressions in invalid_reference_casting rust-lang#124978
- Fix ICE in non-operand `aggregate_raw_ptr` instrinsic codegen rust-lang#125184
- Wrap Context.ext in AssertUnwindSafe rust-lang#125392
- Revert problematic opaque type change rust-lang#125489
- ast: Revert a breaking attribute visiting order change rust-lang#125734
- Update to LLVM 18.1.7 rust-lang#126061

r? cuviper
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 7, 2024

⌛ Testing commit ac45caa with merge 49f3109...

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 7, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jun 7, 2024
@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Jun 7, 2024

As seen in #126102 which failed as well, I think we need to backport the CI fix #126011

@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

Correct.

@cuviper
Copy link
Member Author

cuviper commented Jun 7, 2024

Ok, I can pull that as well as your other backport.

…xpr-attrs, r=davidtwco"

This reverts commit 57dad1d, reversing
changes made to 36316df.
@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

Should only need 40291bc

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 7, 2024
@cuviper
Copy link
Member Author

cuviper commented Jun 7, 2024

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 7, 2024

📌 Commit c689624 has been approved by cuviper

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 7, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 7, 2024

⌛ Testing commit c689624 with merge f4d7315...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
[beta] backports

- Fix insufficient logic when searching for the underlying allocation rust-lang#124761
- Handle field projections like slice indexing in invalid_reference_casting rust-lang#124908
- Handle Deref expressions in invalid_reference_casting rust-lang#124978
- Fix ICE in non-operand `aggregate_raw_ptr` instrinsic codegen rust-lang#125184
- Wrap Context.ext in AssertUnwindSafe rust-lang#125392
- Revert problematic opaque type change rust-lang#125489
- ast: Revert a breaking attribute visiting order change rust-lang#125734
- Update to LLVM 18.1.7 rust-lang#126061
- Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on beta rust-lang#126102 / rust-lang#126101
- Silence double-symlink errors while building solaris toolchain rust-lang#126011

r? cuviper
workingjubilee added a commit to workingjubilee/rustc that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on nightly

As discussed in [today's t-compiler meeting](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bweekly.5D.202024-06-06/near/443079505), this reverts PR rust-lang#124099 to fix P-critical beta regressions rust-lang#125199.

r? `@wesleywiser`

Opening as draft so that `@wesleywiser` and `@apiraino,` you can tell me whether you wanted:
1. a `beta-accepted` revert of rust-lang#124099 on nightly (this PR)? That will need to be backported to beta (even though rust-lang#126093 may be the last of those)
2. a revert of rust-lang#124099 on beta?
3. all of the above?

I also opened rust-lang#126102, another draft PR to revert rust-lang#124099 on beta, should you choose options 2 or 3.
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job armhf-gnu failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 7, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jun 7, 2024
workingjubilee added a commit to workingjubilee/rustc that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on nightly

As discussed in [today's t-compiler meeting](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bweekly.5D.202024-06-06/near/443079505), this reverts PR rust-lang#124099 to fix P-critical beta regressions rust-lang#125199.

r? ``@wesleywiser``

Opening as draft so that ``@wesleywiser`` and ``@apiraino,`` you can tell me whether you wanted:
1. a `beta-accepted` revert of rust-lang#124099 on nightly (this PR)? That will need to be backported to beta (even though rust-lang#126093 may be the last of those)
2. a revert of rust-lang#124099 on beta?
3. all of the above?

I also opened rust-lang#126102, another draft PR to revert rust-lang#124099 on beta, should you choose options 2 or 3.
@cuviper
Copy link
Member Author

cuviper commented Jun 7, 2024

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 7, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#126101 - lqd:revert-124099, r=wesleywiser

Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on nightly

As discussed in [today's t-compiler meeting](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bweekly.5D.202024-06-06/near/443079505), this reverts PR rust-lang#124099 to fix P-critical beta regressions rust-lang#125199.

r? ``@wesleywiser``

Opening as draft so that ``@wesleywiser`` and ``@apiraino,`` you can tell me whether you wanted:
1. a `beta-accepted` revert of rust-lang#124099 on nightly (this PR)? That will need to be backported to beta (even though rust-lang#126093 may be the last of those)
2. a revert of rust-lang#124099 on beta?
3. all of the above?

I also opened rust-lang#126102, another draft PR to revert rust-lang#124099 on beta, should you choose options 2 or 3.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 7, 2024

⌛ Testing commit c689624 with merge 7bb6510...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 7, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: cuviper
Pushing 7bb6510 to beta...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jun 7, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 7bb6510 into rust-lang:beta Jun 7, 2024
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.79.0 milestone Jun 7, 2024
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2024
Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on nightly

As discussed in [today's t-compiler meeting](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bweekly.5D.202024-06-06/near/443079505), this reverts PR rust-lang#124099 to fix P-critical beta regressions rust-lang#125199.

r? ``@wesleywiser``

Opening as draft so that ``@wesleywiser`` and ``@apiraino,`` you can tell me whether you wanted:
1. a `beta-accepted` revert of rust-lang#124099 on nightly (this PR)? That will need to be backported to beta (even though rust-lang#126093 may be the last of those)
2. a revert of rust-lang#124099 on beta?
3. all of the above?

I also opened rust-lang#126102, another draft PR to revert rust-lang#124099 on beta, should you choose options 2 or 3.
@cuviper cuviper deleted the beta-next branch June 14, 2024 01:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.