Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use strict ops instead of checked ops #3694

Merged

Conversation

southball
Copy link
Contributor

What

Replace checked_add(...).unwrap() with strict_add(...), etc.

Resolves #3668.

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

This looks great, thanks for the PR!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 21, 2024

📌 Commit ef22eb1 has been approved by RalfJung

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 21, 2024

⌛ Testing commit ef22eb1 with merge dca0151...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 21, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: RalfJung
Pushing dca0151 to master...

@bors bors merged commit dca0151 into rust-lang:master Jun 21, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use strict_{add,sub,...} instead of checked_{add,sub,...}.unwrap()
3 participants