Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dynamic spec generation depends on %setup (for no good reason) #3063

Closed
pmatilai opened this issue Apr 25, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #3084
Closed

Dynamic spec generation depends on %setup (for no good reason) #3063

pmatilai opened this issue Apr 25, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #3084
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@pmatilai
Copy link
Member

pmatilai commented Apr 25, 2024

While poking around with debuginfo stuff, ran into the fact that %specpartsdir is generated from %setup, which limits its usefulness somewhat. Most real-world packages of course do have %setup but now with %builddir, there's no reason to limit specparts to those packages.

Should probably create it at the same time as %builddir itself to ensure its always there.

@pmatilai pmatilai added the bug label Apr 25, 2024
@pmatilai pmatilai added this to the 4.20.0 milestone Apr 25, 2024
@Conan-Kudo
Copy link
Member

So this is similar to #3042 (and probably really just a more generic version of that issue).

pmatilai added a commit to pmatilai/rpm that referenced this issue May 10, 2024
There's no reason %specpartsdir should be dependent on %setup use,
just create it when we create the build directory too. Update tests
accordingly.

The spec parse test is noteworthy, the specparts dir creation no longer
shows up in spec parse output, which certainly is the way it should be:
this is rpm internal infrastructure stuff and nothing to do with spec
*parse*, this all only takes place during builds.

Fixes: rpm-software-management#3063
pmatilai added a commit to pmatilai/rpm that referenced this issue May 10, 2024
There's no reason %specpartsdir should be dependent on %setup use,
just create it when we create the build directory too. Update tests
accordingly.

The spec parse test is noteworthy, the specparts dir creation no longer
shows up in spec parse output, which certainly is the way it should be:
this is rpm internal infrastructure stuff and nothing to do with spec
*parse*, this all only takes place during builds.

Fixes: rpm-software-management#3063
ffesti pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 13, 2024
There's no reason %specpartsdir should be dependent on %setup use,
just create it when we create the build directory too. Update tests
accordingly.

The spec parse test is noteworthy, the specparts dir creation no longer
shows up in spec parse output, which certainly is the way it should be:
this is rpm internal infrastructure stuff and nothing to do with spec
*parse*, this all only takes place during builds.

Fixes: #3063
dmnks pushed a commit to dmnks/rpm that referenced this issue May 17, 2024
There's no reason %specpartsdir should be dependent on %setup use,
just create it when we create the build directory too. Update tests
accordingly.

The spec parse test is noteworthy, the specparts dir creation no longer
shows up in spec parse output, which certainly is the way it should be:
this is rpm internal infrastructure stuff and nothing to do with spec
*parse*, this all only takes place during builds.

Fixes: rpm-software-management#3063
(cherry picked from commit f3f9f2c)
dmnks pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 17, 2024
There's no reason %specpartsdir should be dependent on %setup use,
just create it when we create the build directory too. Update tests
accordingly.

The spec parse test is noteworthy, the specparts dir creation no longer
shows up in spec parse output, which certainly is the way it should be:
this is rpm internal infrastructure stuff and nothing to do with spec
*parse*, this all only takes place during builds.

Fixes: #3063
(cherry picked from commit f3f9f2c)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants