add multiple_topic_monitor to rosdistro

[yukkysaito]

Please add the following dependency to the rosdep database.

Package name:

multiple_topic_monitor

Package Upstream Source:

https://github.com/yukkysaito/multiple_topic_monitor

Purpose of using this:

This is a ROS 2 package for monitoring the frequency and delay of multiple topics.

Distro packaging links: https://github.com/yukkysaito/multiple_topic_monitor/blob/humble/README.md

Background : ros2-gbp/ros2-gbp-github-org#502 (comment)

Links to Distribution Packages

• Debian: https://packages.debian.org/
  • not available
• Ubuntu: https://packages.ubuntu.com/
  • not available
• Fedora: https://packages.fedoraproject.org/
  • not available
• Arch: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/
  • not available
• Gentoo: https://packages.gentoo.org/
  • not available
• macOS: https://formulae.brew.sh/
  • not available
• Alpine: https://pkgs.alpinelinux.org/packages
  • not available
• NixOS/nixpkgs: https://search.nixos.org/packages
  • not available
• openSUSE: https://software.opensuse.org/package/
  • not available
• rhel: https://rhel.pkgs.org/
  • not available

Checks

• All packages have a declared license in the package.xml
• This repository has a LICENSE file
• This package is expected to build on the submitted rosdistro

[clalancette]

New package review checklist

• At least one of the following must be present
  • Top level license file:
  • Per package license files:
• License is OSI-approved:
• License correctly listed in package.xmls
• Public source repo: https://github.com/yukkysaito/multiple_topic_monitor.git
• Source repository contains ROS packages
• Each package meets REP-144 naming conventions - This one is a little hard to determine for sure, as the name is pretty generic. However, it does implement generic functionality, so I think that is OK.

The checklist above is good. However, looking at the package I notice that the description and license in the setup.py are still TODO: https://github.com/yukkysaito/multiple_topic_monitor/blob/60f9affe91514f61f7ee26524c896b6af87903e3/setup.py#L18-L19 .

Once we fix that, I think this will be OK to get in.

[yukkysaito]

The checklist above is good. However, looking at the package I notice that the description and license in the setup.py are still TODO: https://github.com/yukkysaito/multiple_topic_monitor/blob/60f9affe91514f61f7ee26524c896b6af87903e3/setup.py#L18-L19 .

@clalancette
Thank you for your review.
I updated the the description and license in the setup.py