Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cob_driver: 0.7.16-2 in 'noetic/distribution.yaml' [bloom] #39962

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 20, 2024

Conversation

fmessmer
Copy link
Contributor

Increasing version of package(s) in repository cob_driver to 0.7.16-2:

cob_base_drive_chain

  • No changes

cob_bms_driver

  • No changes

cob_canopen_motor

  • No changes

cob_driver

  • No changes

cob_elmo_homing

  • No changes

cob_generic_can

  • No changes

cob_light

  • No changes

cob_mimic

  • No changes

cob_phidget_em_state

  • No changes

cob_phidget_power_state

  • No changes

cob_phidgets

  • No changes

cob_relayboard

  • No changes

cob_scan_unifier

* Merge pull request #443 <https://github.com/4am-robotics/cob_driver/issues/443> from mbeutelspacher/fix/scan_unifier_negative_angle_increment
  fix(cob_scan_unifier): fix handeling of negative angle_increments
* fix(cob_scan_unifier): fix handeling of negative angle_increments
  laser scanners that are upside down often have negative
  angle_increments (and also angle_max < angle_min).
  Since we use angle_max=M_PI angle_min=-M_PI in the unified scan here, we
  can't just copy the angle increment but need to use the absolute value
  of angle_increments
* Contributors: Felix Messmer, Max Beutelspacher

cob_sick_lms1xx

  • No changes

cob_sick_s300

  • No changes

cob_sound

  • No changes

cob_undercarriage_ctrl

  • No changes

cob_utilities

  • No changes

cob_voltage_control

  • No changes

laser_scan_densifier

  • No changes

@github-actions github-actions bot added the noetic Issue/PR is for the ROS 1 Noetic distribution label Feb 20, 2024
@fmessmer
Copy link
Contributor Author

this is a rather organizational release because we transferred ownership of the code repo as well as the release repo

same questions arise here as in #39932 (comment)

@clalancette clalancette merged commit 8a78b64 into ros:master Feb 20, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
noetic Issue/PR is for the ROS 1 Noetic distribution
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants