Refactor Member Ignoring Method smell in ConditionSerializer class

[emaiannone]

Hi, I'm Emanuele Iannone, a master student at University of Salerno.
Since my bachelor's thesis I have been working on a **code smell refactoring plugin called aDoctor, which is able to identify and fix energy-related problems in Android apps.
I launched it on your project, finding different instances of code smells. I chose one of them and let the plugin automatically fix it.
In this case I chose Member Ignoring Method, that is present when a non static method does not use at all instance variables and other non static methods. These kind of smell may have a non trivial impact on energy consumption, as shown in this paper: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584918301678.
Besides, this kind of refactoring does not impact on the functionalities of your app, so it is totally safe. Let me know if you are interested in this refactoring proposal.

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #311 into master will increase coverage by 8.12%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #311      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage      9.26%   17.38%   +8.12%     
============================================
  Files           430      443      +13     
  Lines         12373    12975     +602     
  Branches       1411     1517     +106     
============================================
+ Hits           1146     2256    +1110     
+ Misses        10985    10408     -577     
- Partials        242      311      +69

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ	Complexity Δ
...ge/backend/json/condition/ConditionSerializer.java	0% <ø> (ø)	0 <0> (ø)	⬇️
...ain/java/ryey/easer/core/log/ActivityLogService.kt	17.5% <0%> (-1.42%)	0% <0%> (-3%)
...ey/easer/core/data/storage/ProfileDataStorage.java	0% <0%> (ø)	0% <0%> (ø)	⬇️
.../easer/core/ui/data/script/EditScriptActivity.java	0% <0%> (ø)	0% <0%> (ø)	⬇️
...pp/src/main/java/ryey/easer/skills/SkillUtils.java	0% <0%> (ø)	0% <0%> (ø)	⬇️
...data/storage/backend/json/script/ScriptParser.java	0% <0%> (ø)	0% <0%> (ø)	⬇️
...aser/core/ui/data/profile/EditProfileActivity.java	0% <0%> (ø)	0% <0%> (ø)	⬇️
...ryey/easer/core/data/storage/EventDataStorage.java	0% <0%> (ø)	0% <0%> (ø)	⬇️
...yey/easer/core/data/storage/ScriptDataStorage.java	0% <0%> (ø)	0% <0%> (ø)	⬇️
...in/java/ryey/easer/core/ui/data/EditDataProto.java	0% <0%> (ø)	0% <0%> (ø)	⬇️
... and 217 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update eb61218...fa30b32. Read the comment docs.

[renyuneyun]

Thanks for the patch (though automatic I suppose, but I'll leave the comment anyway) :)
Indeed, that method can be turned into a function, and it should be. Though, for this case, the impact should be minimum.

Anyway, I'm happy to merge it. But could you please recheck the intentindent? It seems to be incorrect.

[idealist1508]

But could you please recheck the intent? It seems to be incorrect.

Do you mean a failing check? I think it is something wrong with codecov settings.
It seems that coverage does't work since Multidex was enabled. I don't know how to fix it.

[idealist1508]

Indent is wrong

[emaiannone]

Thank you for your feedback. Yeah, I already know this issue, it's because the tool works through ASTs, and I leave the default reformatting of the library when i write back the changes into source files.

[renyuneyun]

You are right... I misspelt the word.