Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI][cluster-launcher] release tests that covers autoscaling case #37680

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Jul 23, 2023

Conversation

scv119
Copy link
Contributor

@scv119 scv119 commented Jul 22, 2023

Why are these changes needed?

Add release test that both check the cluster is alive, as well as the number of (autoscaled) nodes are expected.

Related issue number

Checks

  • I've signed off every commit(by using the -s flag, i.e., git commit -s) in this PR.
  • I've run scripts/format.sh to lint the changes in this PR.
  • I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/.
    • I've added any new APIs to the API Reference. For example, if I added a
      method in Tune, I've added it in doc/source/tune/api/ under the
      corresponding .rst file.
  • I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Release tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

Copy link
Collaborator

@jjyao jjyao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need to install the nightly ray in the cluster otherwise we are testing latest ray

@jjyao
Copy link
Collaborator

jjyao commented Jul 22, 2023

Actually if the cluster.yaml doesn't use docker then by default it's nightly wheel I think

@@ -14,3 +14,9 @@ available_node_types:
resources: {}
node_config:
InstanceType: t3.large
ray.worker.default:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This one doesn't use docker so I think it's using nightly Ray.

@scv119 scv119 added the do-not-merge Do not merge this PR! label Jul 22, 2023
@scv119 scv119 removed the do-not-merge Do not merge this PR! label Jul 23, 2023
@scv119 scv119 merged commit c7f5440 into ray-project:master Jul 23, 2023
103 of 108 checks passed
rickyyx pushed a commit to rickyyx/ray that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2023
…y-project#37680)

Why are these changes needed?
Add release test that both check the cluster is alive, as well as the number of (autoscaled) nodes are expected.
return "rayproject/ray:nightly-py38"
elif docker_override == "commit":
if re.match("^[0-9]+.[0-9]+.[0-9]+$", ray.__version__):
return f"rayproject/ray:{ray.__version__}.{ray.__commit__[:6]}-py38"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

so I think this will be using the driver script's ray version? I guess it will be more flexible if we could pass in a commit (or just a docker image) in?

rickyyx added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2023
…7680) (#37692)

Why are these changes needed?
Add release test that both check the cluster is alive, as well as the number of (autoscaled) nodes are expected.

Co-authored-by: Chen Shen <[email protected]>
rickyyx pushed a commit to rickyyx/ray that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2023
…y-project#37680)

Why are these changes needed?
Add release test that both check the cluster is alive, as well as the number of (autoscaled) nodes are expected.
NripeshN pushed a commit to NripeshN/ray that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2023
…y-project#37680)

Why are these changes needed?
Add release test that both check the cluster is alive, as well as the number of (autoscaled) nodes are expected.

Signed-off-by: NripeshN <[email protected]>
harborn pushed a commit to harborn/ray that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2023
…y-project#37680)

Why are these changes needed?
Add release test that both check the cluster is alive, as well as the number of (autoscaled) nodes are expected.

Signed-off-by: harborn <[email protected]>
harborn pushed a commit to harborn/ray that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2023
…y-project#37680)

Why are these changes needed?
Add release test that both check the cluster is alive, as well as the number of (autoscaled) nodes are expected.
arvind-chandra pushed a commit to lmco/ray that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2023
…y-project#37680)

Why are these changes needed?
Add release test that both check the cluster is alive, as well as the number of (autoscaled) nodes are expected.

Signed-off-by: e428265 <[email protected]>
vymao pushed a commit to vymao/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2023
…y-project#37680)

Why are these changes needed?
Add release test that both check the cluster is alive, as well as the number of (autoscaled) nodes are expected.

Signed-off-by: Victor <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants