Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Release] Update 2.4.0 release logs #34700

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 24, 2023
Merged

Conversation

jjyao
Copy link
Collaborator

@jjyao jjyao commented Apr 23, 2023

Why are these changes needed?

REGRESSION 11.77%: multi_client_put_gigabytes (THROUGHPUT) regresses from 36.20768872444627 to 31.944310601566972 (11.77%) in 2.4.0/microbenchmark.json
REGRESSION 8.76%: actors_per_second (THROUGHPUT) regresses from 808.4407587905971 to 737.6387503180771 (8.76%) in 2.4.0/benchmarks/many_actors.json
REGRESSION 3.41%: client__get_calls (THROUGHPUT) regresses from 1190.7189254696584 to 1150.072552279968 (3.41%) in 2.4.0/microbenchmark.json
REGRESSION 2.21%: pgs_per_second (THROUGHPUT) regresses from 17.712835160069687 to 17.321330540558634 (2.21%) in 2.4.0/benchmarks/many_pgs.json
REGRESSION 1.34%: single_client_put_gigabytes (THROUGHPUT) regresses from 20.38683304648347 to 20.114238761619227 (1.34%) in 2.4.0/microbenchmark.json
REGRESSION 8983.16%: stage_3_creation_time (LATENCY) regresses from 0.054503440856933594 to 4.9506330490112305 (8983.16%) in 2.4.0/stress_tests/stress_test_many_tasks.json
REGRESSION 996.59%: dashboard_p95_latency_ms (LATENCY) regresses from 12.292 to 134.793 (996.59%) in 2.4.0/benchmarks/many_pgs.json
REGRESSION 358.31%: dashboard_p95_latency_ms (LATENCY) regresses from 592.153 to 2713.875 (358.31%) in 2.4.0/benchmarks/many_tasks.json
REGRESSION 198.77%: dashboard_p99_latency_ms (LATENCY) regresses from 1262.576 to 3772.233 (198.77%) in 2.4.0/benchmarks/many_tasks.json
REGRESSION 23.88%: dashboard_p50_latency_ms (LATENCY) regresses from 3.287 to 4.072 (23.88%) in 2.4.0/benchmarks/many_nodes.json
REGRESSION 20.45%: dashboard_p50_latency_ms (LATENCY) regresses from 4.171 to 5.024 (20.45%) in 2.4.0/benchmarks/many_tasks.json
REGRESSION 10.30%: dashboard_p95_latency_ms (LATENCY) regresses from 1722.469 to 1899.861 (10.30%) in 2.4.0/benchmarks/many_actors.json
REGRESSION 8.31%: stage_0_time (LATENCY) regresses from 11.479018211364746 to 12.432663917541504 (8.31%) in 2.4.0/stress_tests/stress_test_many_tasks.json
REGRESSION 7.71%: dashboard_p99_latency_ms (LATENCY) regresses from 2693.468 to 2901.064 (7.71%) in 2.4.0/benchmarks/many_actors.json
REGRESSION 3.71%: 10000_args_time (LATENCY) regresses from 16.44382056200004 to 17.054044035999993 (3.71%) in 2.4.0/scalability/single_node.json
REGRESSION 3.31%: dashboard_p50_latency_ms (LATENCY) regresses from 3.14 to 3.244 (3.31%) in 2.4.0/benchmarks/many_pgs.json
REGRESSION 2.21%: 3000_returns_time (LATENCY) regresses from 5.873062359000016 to 6.002825282000003 (2.21%) in 2.4.0/scalability/single_node.json
REGRESSION 0.83%: avg_pg_remove_time_ms (LATENCY) regresses from 0.8356835120128541 to 0.8426233363353036 (0.83%) in 2.4.0/stress_tests/stress_test_placement_group.json
REGRESSION 0.27%: dashboard_p99_latency_ms (LATENCY) regresses from 133.659 to 134.023 (0.27%) in 2.4.0/benchmarks/many_nodes.json

Related issue number

Checks

  • I've signed off every commit(by using the -s flag, i.e., git commit -s) in this PR.
  • I've run scripts/format.sh to lint the changes in this PR.
  • I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/.
    • I've added any new APIs to the API Reference. For example, if I added a
      method in Tune, I've added it in doc/source/tune/api/ under the
      corresponding .rst file.
  • I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Release tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

Signed-off-by: Jiajun Yao <[email protected]>
@jjyao
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jjyao commented Apr 23, 2023

Previous PR: #33905

Copy link
Contributor

@rkooo567 rkooo567 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@jjyao jjyao merged commit a150463 into ray-project:master Apr 24, 2023
@jjyao jjyao deleted the jjyao/release branch April 24, 2023 20:59
ProjectsByJackHe pushed a commit to ProjectsByJackHe/ray that referenced this pull request May 4, 2023
Signed-off-by: Jiajun Yao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jack He <[email protected]>
architkulkarni pushed a commit to architkulkarni/ray that referenced this pull request May 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants