Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ci][kuberay] Always cleanup KinD cluster #27073

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 27, 2022
Merged

Conversation

wuisawesome
Copy link
Contributor

When cleaning up after the k8s operator tests, we should always delete the k8s cluster even if something went wrong (in fact, it's not clear we even need to clean up the resources within the cluster.

Signed-off-by: Alex Wu [email protected]

Why are these changes needed?

Related issue number

Checks

  • I've run scripts/format.sh to lint the changes in this PR.
  • I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/.
  • I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Release tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

When cleaning up after the k8s operator tests, we should always delete the k8s cluster even if something went wrong (in fact, it's not clear we even need to clean up the resources within the cluster. 

Signed-off-by: Alex Wu <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@DmitriGekhtman DmitriGekhtman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks reasonable.

@wuisawesome
Copy link
Contributor Author

Operator test passes, other failures are unrelated. Merging.

@wuisawesome wuisawesome merged commit 837ef77 into master Jul 27, 2022
@wuisawesome wuisawesome deleted the wuisawesome-patch-5 branch July 27, 2022 04:46
Rohan138 pushed a commit to Rohan138/ray that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2022
When cleaning up after the k8s operator tests, we should always delete the k8s cluster even if something went wrong (in fact, it's not clear we even need to clean up the resources within the cluster. 

Signed-off-by: Alex Wu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rohan138 <[email protected]>
franklsf95 pushed a commit to franklsf95/ray that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2022
When cleaning up after the k8s operator tests, we should always delete the k8s cluster even if something went wrong (in fact, it's not clear we even need to clean up the resources within the cluster. 

Signed-off-by: Alex Wu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Frank Luan <[email protected]>
gramhagen pushed a commit to gramhagen/ray that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2022
When cleaning up after the k8s operator tests, we should always delete the k8s cluster even if something went wrong (in fact, it's not clear we even need to clean up the resources within the cluster. 

Signed-off-by: Alex Wu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Scott Graham <[email protected]>
gramhagen pushed a commit to gramhagen/ray that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2022
When cleaning up after the k8s operator tests, we should always delete the k8s cluster even if something went wrong (in fact, it's not clear we even need to clean up the resources within the cluster. 

Signed-off-by: Alex Wu <[email protected]>
Stefan-1313 pushed a commit to Stefan-1313/ray_mod that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2022
When cleaning up after the k8s operator tests, we should always delete the k8s cluster even if something went wrong (in fact, it's not clear we even need to clean up the resources within the cluster.

Signed-off-by: Alex Wu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stefan van der Kleij <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants