Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[export] Rewrite exportdb formatting. #129260

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

zhxchen17
Copy link
Contributor

Summary: It'll be easier to generate examples if the code doesn't depend on exportdb library.

Test Plan: CI

Differential Revision: D58886554

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jun 21, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/129260

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 2 New Failures, 5 Unrelated Failures

As of commit 4933fb5 with merge base ad76da6 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but was present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

UNSTABLE - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk and has been marked as unstable:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D58886554

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D58886554

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D58886554

zhxchen17 added a commit to zhxchen17/pytorch that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2024
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#129260

It'll be easier to generate examples if the code doesn't depend on exportdb library.

Test Plan: CI

Differential Revision: D58886554
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D58886554

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Jun 25, 2024
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#129260

It'll be easier to generate examples if the code doesn't depend on exportdb library.

Test Plan: CI

Reviewed By: tugsbayasgalan

Differential Revision: D58886554
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D58886554

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -f 'Landed internally'

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, using force because this PR might not pass merge_rules.json but landed internally)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ciflow/inductor ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request fb-exported Merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants