Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix typo in stack_module_state doc #129126

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

mKabouri
Copy link
Contributor

I think there is a typo in the first example of the torch.func.stack_module_state documentation. The first parameter in the function call in the wrapper return is missing an 's'.

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jun 20, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/129126

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)

As of commit e436d51 with merge base 54b0006 (image):

FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Jun 20, 2024

CLA Signed


The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@mKabouri mKabouri requested a review from zou3519 June 28, 2024 16:36
@zou3519
Copy link
Contributor

zou3519 commented Jun 28, 2024

@pytorchbot merge -f "doc change"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants