Skip to content

Compares PAW and MQ for a 7-channel TMT experiment; compares edgeR to two-sample t-test

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

pwilmart/MaxQuant_and_PAW

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

15 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Comparison between MaxQuant and Comet/PAW pipelines (v2)

Comparison between edgeR statistical testing and two-sample t-test

Notebooks:

Comet/PAW - Updated notebook with analysis using Comet/PAW results

Thorough workup of Comet/PAW data with QC checks. Testing is done with edgeR.

Comet/PAW edgeR vs t-test - Comparison of edgeR to t-test

Comparison of edgeR to a two-sample t-test data workup.

Comet/PAW edgeR vs limma - Comparison of edgeR to limma

Comparison of edgeR to limma. limma with its normal data distribution may be more appropriate for intensity data.

Comet/PAW edgeR vs limma-voom - Comparison of edgeR to limma with voom

The group that developed limma and edgeR has a recommended way to combine the best of both packages for analyzing RNA-seq data. We follow that outline here and see how it compares.

MaxQuant - updated notebook with analysis using MaxQuant results

Thorough workup of MaxQuant data with QC checks. Testing is done with edgeR.


old notebook - older notebook with first analysis

Older MaxQuant version was used. Both PAW and MaxQuant results are in the same notebook.

Data is from this publication:

Huan, J., Hornick, N.I., Goloviznina, N.A., Kamimae-Lanning, A.N., David, L.L., Wilmarth, P.A., Mori, T., Chevillet, J.R., Narla, A., Roberts Jr, C.T., Loriaux, M.M., Chang, B.H., and Kurre, P. 2015. Coordinate regulation of residual bone marrow function by paracrine trafficking of AML exosomes. Leukemia, 29(12), p.2285.

This was a mouse bone marrow cell culture experiment with controls (n=3) and leukemia exosome-dosed cells (n=4). The data was collected on a Thermo Fusion tribrid instrument using the SPS MS3 method. Two free data analysis options were explored: the Comet/PAW pipeline or MaxQuant. A canonical UniProt mouse reference protein database was used in both analyses. More details on the search parameters are in the respective notebooks. There are two folders of results files: one for PAW and one for MaxQuant. Each folder has separate Jupyter notebooks for the TMT analysis. The notebooks are very similar in layout and are designed to be opened in side-by-side browser windows for a head-to-head comparison. Some of the markdown cells (mostly in the MaxQuant notebook) differ to illustrate important points. The notebooks are pre-rendered as HTML files and have links at the top of this file.

A widely-used genomics statistical package (edgeR) is used in the analysis of results from both MaxQuant (KUR1502_MQ) and PAW (KUR1502_PAW). Comparisons of edgeR to other statistical analyses are in separate notebooks (t-test:KUR1502_PAW_t-test, limma:KUR1502_PAW_limma, and limma-voom:KUR1502_PAW_limma-voom). There are many papers that have demonstrated the inadequacy of t-tests when replicate numbers are small in these types of omics results. limma and edgeR, with designs for these types of datasets, outperform t-tests in sensitivity and accuracy.

The notebooks in this 2019 update have nicer R code cell contents compared to the 2018 notebook. There is better use of functions and some simplifications in the workflow. The notebooks and R scripts in the repository can serve as starting templates for other analyses.

Further information:

updated May 4, 2019

About

Compares PAW and MQ for a 7-channel TMT experiment; compares edgeR to two-sample t-test

Topics

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published