Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump rainbow 3.0 #287

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 15, 2018
Merged

Bump rainbow 3.0 #287

merged 2 commits into from
May 15, 2018

Conversation

dylanpinn
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #282

@dylanpinn
Copy link
Contributor Author

It appears that this breaks the MRI 2.0 tests

@mvz
Copy link
Contributor

mvz commented Apr 2, 2018

@dylanpinn can you try '>= 2.2', '< 4.0'?

@dylanpinn
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mvz That looks to have fixed the Travis build.

@npetkov
Copy link

npetkov commented Apr 27, 2018

Guys, what happened here, we need a new version released.

@giedriusr
Copy link
Contributor

Indeed. When this is going to be merged?

@mknapik
Copy link
Contributor

mknapik commented May 15, 2018

@mmozuras It looks pretty straightforward. I'm merging it.
Any idea when are you going to release a new version?

@mknapik mknapik merged commit 623e4c6 into prontolabs:master May 15, 2018
@dylanpinn dylanpinn deleted the bump-rainbow branch May 15, 2018 23:08
@dylanpinn dylanpinn restored the bump-rainbow branch May 16, 2018 02:05
aergonaut added a commit to aergonaut/pronto that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2018
Add link to [pronto-goodcheck](https://github.com/aergonaut/pronto-goodcheck).

Note: This depends on the [unreleased change to allow rainbow 3.0](prontolabs#287), so this shouldn't be merged until that change is released to avoid confusing people. I think the version conflict can be ignored if using Bundler and pronto is specified as a Git dependency instead of from RubyGems. But I think we would rather have people using RubyGems, and this also doesn't work for someone who isn't using Bundler.
@aergonaut aergonaut mentioned this pull request Aug 17, 2018
doomspork pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2018
Add link to [pronto-goodcheck](https://github.com/aergonaut/pronto-goodcheck).

Note: This depends on the [unreleased change to allow rainbow 3.0](#287), so this shouldn't be merged until that change is released to avoid confusing people. I think the version conflict can be ignored if using Bundler and pronto is specified as a Git dependency instead of from RubyGems. But I think we would rather have people using RubyGems, and this also doesn't work for someone who isn't using Bundler.
apiology pushed a commit to apiology/pronto that referenced this pull request Dec 27, 2019
apiology pushed a commit to apiology/pronto that referenced this pull request Dec 27, 2019
Add link to [pronto-goodcheck](https://github.com/aergonaut/pronto-goodcheck).

Note: This depends on the [unreleased change to allow rainbow 3.0](prontolabs#287), so this shouldn't be merged until that change is released to avoid confusing people. I think the version conflict can be ignored if using Bundler and pronto is specified as a Git dependency instead of from RubyGems. But I think we would rather have people using RubyGems, and this also doesn't work for someone who isn't using Bundler.
AdamHawkinsa pushed a commit to AdamHawkinsa/pronto that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2023
Add link to [pronto-goodcheck](https://github.com/aergonaut/pronto-goodcheck).

Note: This depends on the [unreleased change to allow rainbow 3.0](prontolabs/pronto#287), so this shouldn't be merged until that change is released to avoid confusing people. I think the version conflict can be ignored if using Bundler and pronto is specified as a Git dependency instead of from RubyGems. But I think we would rather have people using RubyGems, and this also doesn't work for someone who isn't using Bundler.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants