Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(rust): conditionally print the CSEs #16292

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2024

Conversation

coastalwhite
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions bot added internal An internal refactor or improvement rust Related to Rust Polars labels May 17, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.78%. Comparing base (31608f3) to head (70e1d78).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #16292   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.78%   80.78%           
=======================================
  Files        1393     1393           
  Lines      179362   179362           
  Branches     2921     2921           
=======================================
+ Hits       144889   144897    +8     
+ Misses      33970    33962    -8     
  Partials      503      503           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ritchie46 ritchie46 merged commit 7fa728e into pola-rs:main May 17, 2024
22 checks passed
@coastalwhite coastalwhite deleted the conditional-print-cse branch May 17, 2024 12:47
@c-peters c-peters added the accepted Ready for implementation label May 21, 2024
Wouittone pushed a commit to Wouittone/polars that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
accepted Ready for implementation internal An internal refactor or improvement rust Related to Rust Polars
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants