Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 13, 2019. It is now read-only.

relationship to json:API #39

Closed
mjy opened this issue Feb 29, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

relationship to json:API #39

mjy opened this issue Feb 29, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@mjy
Copy link

mjy commented Feb 29, 2016

What is the relation of a phenopacket to the best practices described at https://jsonapi.org/

Are packets just nested under data: there?

M
@cmungall
Copy link
Member

cmungall commented Mar 6, 2016

We're likely to use JSON Schema (follow #31 for this - comments welcome here).

I'm unclear as to compatibility layers between jsonapi and jsonschema. Seems someone asked this here but the question was not answered:
json-api/json-api#271 (comment)

@mjy
Copy link
Author

mjy commented Mar 7, 2016

Closing in favor following #31.

@mjy mjy closed this as completed Mar 7, 2016
cmungall added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 22, 2016
@cmungall
added docs on protobuf and json schema. #31 and #39
f90f94b
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@mjy @cmungall