zig-js is a Zig library (and accompanying JS glue) that enables Zig running in a WebAssembly environment to interact with a JavaScript-based host.
Note this makes it particularly easy for Zig to call into JS. This
doesn't help for JS calling into Zig. This is more akin to Go's
syscall/js
package and not like Rust's wasm-bindgen
.
Note: the main branch of this repository attempts to remain compatible with the latest nightly release of Zig, and therefore may not be compatible with official Zig releases.
// Get and set objects and properties
const document = try js.global.get(js.Object, "document");
defer document.deinit();
const title = try document.getAlloc(js.String, alloc, "title");
defer alloc.free(title);
std.log.info("the title is: {s}", .{str});
try document.set("title", js.string("A new title."));
// Call functions
js.global.call(void, "alert", .{js.string("Hello from Zig!")});
The code is a bit verbose with the error handling but since JS is a
dynamic language there are potential invalid types at every step of the
way. Additionally, deinit
calls are necessary to dereference garbage-collected
values on the host side.
Under the covers, this is hiding a lot of complexity since the JS/WASM ABI only allows passing numeric types and sharing memory.
To use this library, you must integrate a component in both the Zig and JS environment. For Zig, vendor this repository and add the package. For example in your build.zig:
const js = @import("zig-js");
pub fn build(b: *std.build.Builder) !void {
// ... other stuff
exe.addPackage(js.pkg);
}
From JS, install and import the package in the js/
directory (in the future
this will be published to npm). A TypeScript example is shown below but
JS could just as easily be used:
import { ZigJS } from 'zig-js-glue';
// Initialize the stateful zigjs class. You should use one per wasm instance.
const zigjs = new ZigJS();
fetch('my-wasm-file.wasm').then(response =>
response.arrayBuffer()
).then(bytes =>
// When creating your Wasm instance, pass along the zigjs import
// object. You can merge this import object with your own since zigjs
// uses its own namespace.
WebAssembly.instantiate(bytes, zigjs.importObject())
).then(results => {
const { memory, my_func } = results.instance.exports;
// Set the memory since zigjs interfaces with memory.
zigjs.memory = memory;
// Run any of your exported functions!
my_func();
});
WARNING: The zig-js version used in your Zig code and JS code must match. I'm not promising any protocol stability right now so pin your versions appropriately. To determine what version is compatible, look up the tagged version in this repository and the corresponding commits.
The fundamental idea in this is based on the Go syscall/js package. The implementation is relatively diverged since Zig doesn't have a runtime or garbage collection, but the fundamental idea of sharing "refs" and the format of those refs is based on Go's implementation.
The main idea is that Zig communicates to JS what values it would like to request, such as the "global" object. JS generates a "ref" for this object (a unique 64-bit numeric value) and sends that to Zig. This ref now uniquely identifies the value for future calls such as "give me the 'document' property on this ref."
The ref itself is a 64-bit value. For numeric types, the ref is the value. We take advantage of the fact that all numbers in JavaScript are IEEE 754 encoded 64-bit floats and use NaN as a way to send non-numeric values to Zig (NaN-boxing).
NaN in IEEE 754 encoding is 0111_1111_1111_<anything but all 0s>
in binary.
We use a common NaN value of 0111_1111_1111_1000_0000...
so that we can use
the bottom (least-significant) 49 bits to store type information and
a 32-bit ID.
The 32-bit ID is just an index into an array on the JS side. A simple scheme is used to reuse IDs after they're dereferenced.
Usage of this package causes the WASM/JS boundary to be crossed a LOT and this is generally not very fast and not an optimal way to use wasm. The optimal way to use WASM is more like a GPU: have the host (or wasm module) preload a bunch of work into a byte buffer and send it over in one single call. However, this approach is pretty painful. This packge makes interfacing with JS very, very easy. Consider the tradeoffs and choose what is best for you.