Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hotfix/62 missing foreign key constraints #145

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 6, 2016

Conversation

jmiranda
Copy link
Member

@jmiranda jmiranda commented May 6, 2016

No description provided.

@jmiranda jmiranda self-assigned this May 6, 2016
@jmiranda jmiranda added this to the 0.7.9 milestone May 6, 2016
@jmiranda jmiranda merged commit 7ca83f0 into master May 6, 2016
jmiranda added a commit that referenced this pull request May 10, 2016
* Hotfix 0.7.8 (#141)

* minor cleanup to prevent the assign identifier quartz job from throwing hundreds of "Duplicate key" errors if the pool of identifiers is small enough to cause lots of collisions

* removed unnecessarily verbose logging from inventory service

* Purchase Order UI changes to make it more consistent with other pages

* fixed #133: added ability to import order line items into an existing order; also added rollback feature

* fixed #50: Illegal attempt to associate a collection with two open sessions when receiving against purchase order

* Minor enhancements to make UI a little more consistent across entire app

* bumped app version to 0.7.8

* removed annoying inventory sampling report constraint

* fixed #89: made significant performances improvements to the dashboard

* Removed errant text that was committed by accident

* Hotfix/62 missing foreign key constraints (#145)

* added missing primary keys and foreign key constraints to several tables (fixed #62, #108)
* bumped app version to 0.7.9

* Fixed unit test for the show inventory report feature
@jmiranda jmiranda deleted the hotfix/62-missing-foreign-key-constraints branch May 10, 2016 14:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant