Spring boot service name #8006
Spring boot service name #8006
Conversation
Add mdc baggage
…a/io/opentelemetry/javaagent/instrumentation/logback/mdc/v1_0/LogbackSingletons.java Co-authored-by: Mateusz Rzeszutek <[email protected]>
…trumentation into main
|
@adamleantech currently this pr also contains your logback baggage changes |
adamleantech
force-pushed
the
spring-boot-service-name
branch
from
669cbcf
to
cd32a9b
Compare
adamleantech
force-pushed
the
spring-boot-service-name
branch
from
cd32a9b
to
5f07328
Compare
@laurit yeah, i wanted to leave it in draft until rebasing the merge of the baggage changes, should be good now |
|
Closing and reopening to trigger checks |
| @Nullable | ||
| private String findByBootInfApplicationYml() { | ||
| String result = | ||
| loadFromBootInf("application.yml", SpringBootServiceNameDetector::parseNameFromYaml); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks like you've found a bug in the findByClasspath*() methods - they both should in fact be loading files from the BOOT-INF/classes directory. Can you fix these two instead of adding this new method?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To me this looks wrong. @adamleantech why do yo need to explicitly mention BOOT-INF/classes, spring boot class loader automatically handles finding stuff from BOOT-INF/classes you shouldn't need to add it to resource path.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the java agent executes this code before the spring boot app has had chance to do this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@mateuszrzeszutek I found the existing functionality useful when testing the agent against spring boot apps in my IDE where the code has not been assembled into a JAR and therefore the resources are in the usual classpath resource location. Maybe findByClasspath*() should be updated to look in both places?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@adamleantech Thanks, I have added tests and fixed BOOT-INF/classes handling in #8101. Could you review and see if this would work for your use case. If it does you could remove BOOT-INF/classes related code from this PR and only leave handling multiple yaml.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @adamleantech I just merged #8101; can you merge/rebase your PR with main?
|
thanks @adamleantech! |
resolves #7998