Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix check links errors, use latest version of the tool #5199

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 12, 2022

Conversation

bogdandrutu
Copy link
Member

@bogdandrutu bogdandrutu requested a review from a team as a code owner April 12, 2022 23:36
@project-bot project-bot bot added this to In progress in Collector Apr 12, 2022
@bogdandrutu bogdandrutu force-pushed the checklinks branch 2 times, most recently from b56e726 to cd8c4f0 Compare April 12, 2022 23:37
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 12, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #5199 (62e7d61) into main (8eb68f4) will decrease coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5199      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.35%   90.32%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         188      188              
  Lines       11057    11057              
==========================================
- Hits         9991     9987       -4     
- Misses        841      844       +3     
- Partials      225      226       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pdata/internal/common.go 94.16% <0.00%> (-0.78%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8eb68f4...62e7d61. Read the comment docs.

|---------- |---------------------------------------------- |-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Hashing | ["hashing/fnv"](https://pkg.go.dev/hash/fnv) | The project adopted this as the default hashing method due to the efficiency and is reasonable for non cryptographic use |
| Testing | Use `t.Parallel()` where possible | Enabling more test to be run in parallel will speed up the feedback process when working on the project. |
| Scenario | Recommended | Rationale |
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Random nits fixed in CONTRIBUTING.md to prove things work.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was intelij idea complaining that the table is not well formatted, so I pressed the button to fix that :)

Collector automation moved this from In progress to Reviewer approved Apr 12, 2022
Copy link
Member

@dmitryax dmitryax left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for fixing this

@@ -41,8 +41,7 @@ reasonably fast reviews.

### When adding a new component

Consider submitting different PRs for (more details about adding new components
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bogdandrutu bogdandrutu added the Skip Changelog PRs that do not require a CHANGELOG.md entry label Apr 12, 2022
@bogdandrutu bogdandrutu merged commit 7d2df7b into open-telemetry:main Apr 12, 2022
@bogdandrutu bogdandrutu deleted the checklinks branch April 12, 2022 23:53
Nicholaswang pushed a commit to Nicholaswang/opentelemetry-collector that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2022
…y#5199)

* Fix check links errors, use latest version of the tool

See https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/runs/5999091156?check_suite_focus=true

Signed-off-by: Bogdan Drutu <[email protected]>

* Fix broken links in CONTRIBUTING.md

Signed-off-by: Bogdan Drutu <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Skip Changelog PRs that do not require a CHANGELOG.md entry
Projects
No open projects
Collector
  
Reviewer approved
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants