Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added Loki exporter codeowner #1928

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 3, 2021
Merged

Added Loki exporter codeowner #1928

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 3, 2021

Conversation

gramidt
Copy link
Member

@gramidt gramidt commented Jan 3, 2021

Signed-off-by: Granville Schmidt [email protected]

Description:
Adding myself as the code owner of the Loki exporter ( #1900 )

Link to tracking Issue:
#1894

Testing:
N/A

Documentation:
N/A

Signed-off-by: Granville Schmidt <[email protected]>
@gramidt gramidt requested a review from a team as a code owner January 3, 2021 19:19
@project-bot project-bot bot added this to In progress in Collector Jan 3, 2021
@gramidt
Copy link
Member Author

gramidt commented Jan 3, 2021

@anuraaga @bogdandrutu - Per comment on PR 1900 ( #1900 (comment) )

@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ exporter/jaegerthrifthttpexporter/ @open-telemetry/collector-contrib-app
exporter/kinesisexporter/ @open-telemetry/collector-contrib-approvers @owais
exporter/loadbalancingexporter/ @open-telemetry/collector-contrib-approvers @jpkrohling
exporter/logzioexporter/ @open-telemetry/collector-contrib-approvers @yyyogev
exporter/lokiexporter/ @open-telemetry/collector-contrib-approvers @gramidt
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would be good to have 2 people so if you create a PR the other person reviews initially the PR.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Absolutely! I'll ask around who would like to join me as the owner for this exporter. If you have anyone in mind, let me know.

Thank you again for all of your help!

Collector automation moved this from In progress to Reviewer approved Jan 3, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 3, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #1928 (46daa91) into master (07ed5fb) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1928      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.18%   90.19%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         385      385              
  Lines       19056    19056              
==========================================
+ Hits        17185    17187       +2     
+ Misses       1399     1398       -1     
+ Partials      472      471       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 69.88% <ø> (+0.06%) ⬆️
unit 88.95% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
receiver/k8sclusterreceiver/watcher.go 97.64% <0.00%> (+2.35%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 07ed5fb...46daa91. Read the comment docs.

@bogdandrutu bogdandrutu merged commit 160a809 into open-telemetry:master Jan 3, 2021
Collector automation moved this from Reviewer approved to Done Jan 3, 2021
@gramidt gramidt mentioned this pull request Jan 3, 2021
dyladan referenced this pull request in dynatrace-oss-contrib/opentelemetry-collector-contrib Jan 29, 2021
This adds the initial config and factory boilerplate and corresponding tests.

Contributes to: open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector#882

Testing: config and factory tests unit tests added.

Documentation: Added README.

The next PR will add the exporting logic.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
No open projects
Collector
  
Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants