-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reviewers guideline for Pull Request #6209
Comments
@bogdandrutu , @jpkrohling , @codeboten, @tigrannajaryan, Could I ask for your input on this as the maintainers of the project 🥺 ? |
It would be great to have a review guideline! The review guidelines would help not only reviewers but also what contributors can expect from us. I would add to your list which library to use for hashing (see #6136). |
We have this https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#coding-guidelines recommendation which reffers to https://golang.org/doc/effective_go.html, perhaps we need to explain more. |
I did miss that @tigrannajaryan, thanks for sharing. Perhaps it would be worth extending it to include what is the suggestion in order to do X and contribute that back to CONTRIBUTING.md ? I think it would go some way when reviewing and help ask better clarification. Is that a sensible way to go about it? |
I should also add that requiring CGO should be made clear as part of the package. |
Definitely worth extending. |
@tigrannajaryan if you wanna assign this to me, I'll have a PR to iterate over by the end of the day. |
In order to help making sub packages across the repo more consistent, the contribution guide is being updated to reflect that. **Description:** Looking to expand contributions to make consistent approaches to working on the collector and the contrib. **Link to tracking Issue:** open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib#6209
This issue has been inactive for 60 days. It will be closed in 60 days if there is no activity. To ping code owners by adding a component label, see Adding Labels via Comments, or if you are unsure of which component this issue relates to, please ping |
I'm closing this, as I understand the initial proposal was completed. |
Having reviewed a few pull requests, the quality and the approach on how things are done vary a lot and it raised some questions that I wanted to see if we can clarify to help making the PR process easier.
There is a few things I wanted to highlight as such:
There is rather extreme variations in the work of the pull requests and I would like to make the reviewing experience consistent regardless of the reviewer.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: