Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

faster maps #1026

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

faster maps #1026

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

Fil
Copy link
Contributor

@Fil Fil commented Aug 9, 2022

it's faster to allocate a typed array with a known size than through Array.from — when dealing with millions of points, this can boost the performance quite a bit.

(results of a pairing session with @yurivish)

saving as draft for now (we'll want to make the test on the scale type less ad-hoc, probably?)

see also #888

return [name, scale === undefined ? value : map(value, scale)];
return [
name,
scale === undefined ? value : map(value, scale, ["x", "y", "r"].includes(scaleName) ? Float64Array : undefined)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TBD: this is possibly wrong, since in the case of numbers we want to wrap the scale function and return NaN when the result is null? Or maybe it never happens?

@@ -88,13 +88,19 @@ export function arrayify(data, type) {
// An optimization of type.from(values, f): if the given values are already an
// instanceof the desired array type, the faster values.map method is used.
export function map(values, f, type = Array) {
return values instanceof type ? values.map(f) : type.from(values, f);
if (values instanceof type) return values.map(f);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we know that values is an array here? It could be that we are using map for non-arrays like iterables and {length} objects too.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants