Reduced LOC by replacing several instances of Value::Int {}
, Value::Float{}
, Value::Bool {}
, and Value::String {}
with Value::int()
, Value::float()
, Value::boolean()
and Value::string()
#7412
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
While perusing Value.rs, I noticed the
Value::int()
,Value::float()
,Value::boolean()
andValue::string()
constructors, which seem designed to make it easier to construct various Values, but which aren't used often at all in the codebase. So, using a few find-replaces regexes, I increased their usage. This reduces overall LOC because structures like this:are changed into
and are respected as such by the project's formatter.
There are little readability concerns because the second argument to all of these is
span
, and it's almost always extremely obvious which is the span at every callsite.User-Facing Changes
None.
Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
cargo fmt --all -- --check
to check standard code formatting (cargo fmt --all
applies these changes)cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect
to check that you're using the standard code stylecargo test --workspace
to check that all tests passAfter Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update the documentation after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.