Skip to content

[NeurIPS 2023] Code for the paper "Revisiting Adversarial Training for ImageNet: Architectures, Training and Generalization across Threat Models"

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

nmndeep/revisiting-at

Repository files navigation

Revisiting Adversarial Training for ImageNet: Architectures, Training and Generalization across Threat Models

Naman D Singh, Francesco Croce, Matthias Hein

University of Tübingen

NeurIPS 2023

Abstract

While adversarial training has been extensively studied for ResNet architectures and low resolution datasets like CIFAR, much less is known for ImageNet. Given the recent debate about whether transformers are more robust than convnets, we revisit adversarial training on ImageNet comparing ViTs and ConvNeXts. Extensive experiments show that minor changes in architecture, most notably replacing PatchStem with ConvStem, and training scheme have a significant impact on the achieved robustness. These changes not only increase robustness in the seen $\ell_\infty$-threat model, but even more so improve generalization to unseen $\ell_1/\ell_2$-robustness.

readme_teaser

Code

Requirements (specific versions tested on):
fastargs-1.2.0 autoattack-0.1 pytorch-1.13.1 torchvision-0.14.1 robustbench-1.1 timm-0.8.0.dev0, GPUtil

Training

The bash script in run_train.sh trains the model model.arch. For clean training: adv.attack none and for adversarial training set adv.attack apgd.
For the standard setting as in the paper (heavy augmentations) set data.augmentations 1, model.model_ema 1 and training.label_smoothing 1.
To train models with Convolution-Stem (CvSt) set model.not_original 1.
The code does standard APGD adversarial training.
The file utils_architecture.py has model definitions for the new CvSt models, all models are built on top of timm imports.

Evaluating a model

The file runner_aa_eval runs AutoAttack(AA). Passing fullaa 1 runs complete AA whereas fullaa 0 runs the first two attacks (APGD-CE and APGD-T) in AA.

Checkpoints - ImageNet $\ell_{\infty} = 4/255$ robust models.

The link location includes weights for the clean model (the one used as initialization for Adversarial Training (AT)), the robust model, and the full-AA log for $\ell_{\infty}, \ell_2$ and $\ell_1$ attacks.
Note: the higher resolution numbers use the same checkpoint as for the standard resolution of 224 - only evaluation is done at the higher resolution mentioned.

Model-Name epochs res. Clean acc. AA - $\ell_{\infty}$ acc. Checkpoint (clean-init
and robust)
ConvNext-iso-CvSt 300 224 70.2 45.9 Link
ViT-S 300 224 69.2 44.0 Link
ViT-S-CvSt 300 224 72.5 48.1 Link
ConvNext-T 300 224 72.4 48.6 Link
ConvNext-T-CvSt 300 224 72.7 49.5 Link
ViT-M-CvSt 50 224 72.4 48.8 Link
ConvNext-S-CvSt 50 224 74.1 52.4 Link
ViT-B 50 224 73.3 50.0 Link
ConvNext-B 50 224 75.6 54.3 Link
ViT-B-CvSt 250 224 76.3 54.7 Link
ConvNext-B-CvSt 250 224 75.9 56.1 Link
ConvNext-B-CvSt* --- 256 76.9 57.3 Link
ConvNext-L-CvSt 100 224 77.0 57.7 Link
ConvNext-L-CvSt* --- 320 78.2 59.4 Link
*: increased resolution (only for evaluation) also leads to increased FLOPs.

Checkpoints along with accuracy and robustness logs for ImageNet models finetuned to be robust at $\ell_\infty = 8/255$ are available here: Link


Citation

If you use our code/models cite our work using the follwoing BibTex entry:

@inproceedings{singh2023revisiting,
  title={Revisiting Adversarial Training for ImageNet: Architectures, Training and Generalization across Threat Models},
  author={Singh, Naman D and Croce, Francesco and Hein, Matthias},
  booktitle={NeurIPS},
  year={2023}}

About

[NeurIPS 2023] Code for the paper "Revisiting Adversarial Training for ImageNet: Architectures, Training and Generalization across Threat Models"

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published