Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[7hH8ZRTU] Add new regex matcher by group names #654

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 15, 2024

Conversation

gem-neo4j
Copy link
Contributor

@gem-neo4j gem-neo4j commented Aug 13, 2024

Added a new function for a support case surrounding the ability to reference group names.

Docs: https://github.com/neo4j/docs-apoc/pull/312

@gem-neo4j gem-neo4j force-pushed the dev_add_new_groupby_regex_matcher branch 2 times, most recently from cbf76bb to d059533 Compare August 14, 2024 07:32
@gem-neo4j gem-neo4j changed the title [NOID] Add new regex matcher by group names [7hH8ZRTU] Add new regex matcher by group names Aug 14, 2024
@gem-neo4j gem-neo4j force-pushed the dev_add_new_groupby_regex_matcher branch from fc38fb1 to c969993 Compare August 14, 2024 08:20
Copy link
Contributor

@JoelBergstrand JoelBergstrand left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Really cool! One small typo+ , otherwise looks good!

@@ -532,6 +538,139 @@ public void testRegexGroups() {
});
}

@Test
public void singleGroupNyName() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
public void singleGroupNyName() {
public void singleGroupByName() {

}

@Test
public void multipleGroupsNyName() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
public void multipleGroupsNyName() {
public void multipleGroupsByName() {

}

@Test
public void groupNyNameWithMissingFirstGroup() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
public void groupNyNameWithMissingFirstGroup() {
public void groupByNameWithMissingFirstGroup() {

}

@Test
public void groupNyNameWithMissingSecondGroup() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
public void groupNyNameWithMissingSecondGroup() {
public void groupByNameWithMissingSecondGroup() {

}

@Test
public void groupNyNameNoMatches() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
public void groupNyNameNoMatches() {
public void groupByNameNoMatches() {

}

@Test
public void groupNyNameWithInvalidPattern1() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
public void groupNyNameWithInvalidPattern1() {
public void groupByNameWithInvalidPattern1() {

}

@Test
public void groupNyNameWithInvalidPattern2() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
public void groupNyNameWithInvalidPattern2() {
public void groupByNameWithInvalidPattern2() {

}

@Test
public void groupNyNameWithNoGroupNames() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
public void groupNyNameWithNoGroupNames() {
public void groupByNameWithNoGroupNames() {

@gem-neo4j gem-neo4j merged commit b486a60 into dev Aug 15, 2024
8 checks passed
@gem-neo4j gem-neo4j deleted the dev_add_new_groupby_regex_matcher branch August 15, 2024 08:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants