Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

added module for monitoring transmission-daemon via rpc #15

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2012

Conversation

ghuntley
Copy link
Contributor

note: this commit is dependant on transmissionrpc, documentation will
need to be updated to reflect installation, etc.

$ easy_install transmissionrpc

transmission-panel

transmission-settings

@gugahoi
Copy link
Collaborator

gugahoi commented Dec 26, 2011

Ha, this is nice. There is already a pull request for this but I guess yours is fully working and might be best.

@Mar2zz
Copy link
Contributor

Mar2zz commented Dec 28, 2011

throw the transmissionrpc folder inside the external folder and it will work without installing transmissionrpc

@gugahoi
Copy link
Collaborator

gugahoi commented Dec 29, 2011

Don't worry this should be done with the merge. The problem is that master is not yet independent so it does not have the structure yet, but the next thing to go to master will definitely be the independent libraries.

@gugahoi
Copy link
Collaborator

gugahoi commented Jan 5, 2012

Any chance you can update this and fix any conflicts?

@ghuntley
Copy link
Contributor Author

ghuntley commented Jan 5, 2012

I have tested this patch-set against latest mrkipling/maraschino@master and can confirm it applies cleanly.

Can you handle the transmissionrpc module inclusion after the merge as there currently is no defined structure for independent libraries.

@gugahoi
Copy link
Collaborator

gugahoi commented Jan 5, 2012

We can but if you have the chance to do this before we get the chance to merge it would be great. If you want to have a look at the structure, just see either the experimental branch here or pull request #32.

Are you sure it merges cleanly? Git says it doesn't and I'm pretty sure I had to modify a couple of (minor) things to get it going properly but I also merged other branches before (on the experimental branch) so it might have happened from other merges. This is already included in there as well as all open pull reuqests btw.

@ghuntley
Copy link
Contributor Author

ghuntley commented Jan 5, 2012

I've made adjustments as per your recommendations - commit dff020e is ready for integration, it has been merged successfully with master@latest and tests OK.

note(s):
    - transmissionrpc 0.8 included in lib/transmissionrpc.
    - marachino.py now sources libaries from lib/* using code snatched
      from current experimental branch.

note(s):
    - transmissionrpc 0.8 included in lib/transmissionrpc.
    - marachino.py now sources libaries from lib/* using code snatched
      from current experimental branch.
@ghuntley
Copy link
Contributor Author

... marco ... ?

@gugahoi
Copy link
Collaborator

gugahoi commented Jan 14, 2012

polo...

@ghuntley
Copy link
Contributor Author

All clear for integration?

Sent from my phone

On 14/01/2012, at 7:57 PM, Gustavo [email protected] wrote:

polo...


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#15 (comment)

@gugahoi
Copy link
Collaborator

gugahoi commented Jan 14, 2012

Think so. As far as my tests went, all is good but @mrkipling is the one to make the merge tho and he's been sick the last few days and quite busy before that.

@mrkipling mrkipling merged commit dff020e into mrkipling:master Feb 5, 2012
@mrkipling
Copy link
Owner

Sorry this took so long to review - I've just merged it in. I don't use Transmission myself and haven't tested it thoroughly, but looking at the code it seems straight-forward enough (and gugahoi has informed me that it worked nicely for him). I'll hand it over to Transmission users on the XBMC forums to test.

Thanks for the contribution!

@N3MIS15
Copy link
Collaborator

N3MIS15 commented Feb 9, 2012

ghuntley, i had a problem where the module would vanish while a torrent was initialising. refer #69. i was unable to get the total eta to work after this 'fix' any chance you could take a look?

@ghuntley
Copy link
Contributor Author

ghuntley commented Feb 9, 2012

Sure.

I'm on holidays, when I get back (2 weeks) I can have a stab at it

Sent from my phone

On 09/02/2012, at 7:09 PM, David [email protected] wrote:

ghuntley, i had a problem where the module would vanish while a torrent was initialising. refer #69. i was unable to get the total eta to work after this 'fix' any chance you could take a look?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#15 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants