Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

It's possible to interact, break, placing and attack around obstructions in 3rd person view #6181

Closed
WSDguy2014 opened this issue Jul 27, 2017 · 10 comments · Fixed by #7865
Closed
Labels
Android Bug Issues that were confirmed to be a bug @ Client / Controls / Input Request / Suggestion The issue makes a suggestion for something that should be done but isn't a new feature

Comments

@WSDguy2014
Copy link

I found a glitch only on phone/tablet version of Minetest, how to reproduce a glitch?
I build a wall with a chest that cannot be reached. Build like this, stand on this position, make sure to toggle 3rd person mode and try to interact a chest to open and store/steal items. If you did it correctly, you reproduced a glitch. If you not, its going to be sad :(
image

@kingoscargames
Copy link
Contributor

I dont think this is a glitch.

@rubenwardy rubenwardy added Android Bug Issues that were confirmed to be a bug labels Jul 27, 2017
@WSDguy2014
Copy link
Author

Keep in mind, this glitch only works on Android version. It need to reproduce a glitch to make players interact through walls and stuff like that.

@rubenwardy rubenwardy added Unconfirmed bug Bug report that has not been confirmed to exist/be reproducible and removed Bug Issues that were confirmed to be a bug labels Jul 27, 2017
@kingoscargames
Copy link
Contributor

kingoscargames commented Jul 27, 2017

Do you mean being able to open chests like this?:
screenshot_2017-07-28-00-26-00

screenshot_2017-07-28-00-26-05
(Screenshots were made on android version 0.4.15 (and this post was also made on mobile))

Edit:i fixed a typing error

@WSDguy2014
Copy link
Author

@kingoscargames Yes.

@kingoscargames
Copy link
Contributor

Thats because mobile doesnt have a cursor and can just click everywhere.

@WSDguy2014
Copy link
Author

WSDguy2014 commented Jul 28, 2017

Or crosshair. Especially if you playing with mods trying to shoot at the animal for example.

@rubenwardy
Copy link
Member

is this still an issue after 01c319d ?

@paramat paramat changed the title It's possible to interact, break, placing and attack backwards in 3rd person view without looking back??? It's possible to interact, break, placing and attack backwards in 3rd person view without looking back Sep 21, 2017
@paramat
Copy link
Contributor

paramat commented Sep 21, 2017

I expect it still happens because the chest is within interact distance but is behind an obstruction. There would need to be a check for an obstruction.

@paramat paramat added Bug Issues that were confirmed to be a bug Request / Suggestion The issue makes a suggestion for something that should be done but isn't a new feature and removed Unconfirmed bug Bug report that has not been confirmed to exist/be reproducible labels Sep 21, 2017
@srifqi
Copy link
Member

srifqi commented May 10, 2018

How about making it always pointing at crosshair (center) when in 3rd person view?

@WSDguy2014
Copy link
Author

WSDguy2014 commented May 11, 2018

@srifqi Yes, sure it's needed like in the PC does. I saw the the crosshair in first person view in the modified Minetest build engine for the Android, such as CubeMator, it's badly functions (like breaking the block through and badly updates node/entity highlight).
image

@paramat paramat changed the title It's possible to interact, break, placing and attack backwards in 3rd person view without looking back It's possible to interact, break, placing and attack around obstructions in 3rd person view Aug 5, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Android Bug Issues that were confirmed to be a bug @ Client / Controls / Input Request / Suggestion The issue makes a suggestion for something that should be done but isn't a new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants