Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gh: patch CVE-2021-43565 #9894

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: fasttrack/2.0
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

arc9693
Copy link
Contributor

@arc9693 arc9693 commented Jul 22, 2024

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./SPECS/LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/data/licenses.json, ./SPECS/LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./SPECS/LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • If you are adding/removing a .spec file that has multiple-versions supported, please add @microsoft/cbl-mariner-multi-package-reviewers team as reviewer (Eg. golang has 2 versions 1.18, 1.21+)
  • Ready to merge

Summary

What does the PR accomplish, why was it needed?
gh: patch CVE-2021-43565

Change Log
  • Change
  • Change
  • Change
Does this affect the toolchain?

NO

Associated issues
  • #xxxx
Links to CVEs
Test Methodology

@arc9693 arc9693 marked this pull request as ready for review July 22, 2024 13:36
@arc9693 arc9693 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 22, 2024 13:36
@mfrw mfrw added security 3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 fasttrack/2.0 PRs Destined for AzureLinux 2.0 and removed 3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 labels Jul 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
fasttrack/2.0 PRs Destined for AzureLinux 2.0 security
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants