-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 310
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
♻️ Switch to using new startTime column #1041
Conversation
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@lukevella has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 38 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe recent changes focus on simplifying the handling of options and user context within the application. By removing unnecessary functions and streamlining logic, the codebase now provides a more direct and straightforward approach to managing poll options and user-related functionalities. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
1 Ignored Deployment
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/web/src/components/poll-context.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/utils/date-time-utils.ts (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/web/src/utils/date-time-utils.ts
Additional comments: 1
apps/web/src/components/poll-context.tsx (1)
- 226-232: The refactoring to directly use
createOptionsContextValue
in theOptionsProvider
component simplifies the generation of options based on poll data. This change removes the previously conditional logic, making the code more straightforward and easier to maintain. However, it's crucial to ensure that all dependent components and functionalities that relied on the olddecodeOptions
logic are updated accordingly to work with the new approach. Additionally, the use ofeslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps
at line 231 suggests that there might be dependencies not included in the dependency array ofReact.useMemo
. While this might be intentional to avoid unnecessary re-renders, it's important to verify that this does not lead to stale data being used, especially sincetimeFormat
is not included in the dependency array but is used in the component. Consider adding a comment explaining the rationale behind excluding certain dependencies to avoid confusion for future maintainers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- apps/web/src/components/poll-context.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/user-provider.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/src/utils/date-time-utils.ts (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- apps/web/src/components/poll-context.tsx
- apps/web/src/utils/date-time-utils.ts
Additional comments: 3
apps/web/src/components/user-provider.tsx (3)
- 30-30: The simplification of the
useUser
function to directly return the result ofuseRequiredContext(UserContext, "UserContext")
is a positive change. It makes the code cleaner and more straightforward by removing unnecessary conditional logic. This change should improve maintainability and readability.- 27-33: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-62]
The removal of the
useAuthenticatedUser
function, as mentioned in the summary, is not directly visible in the provided code snippet. However, given the entire file's context, its absence indicates successful removal. This change likely contributes to the simplification and streamlining of authentication-related logic within the component. It's important to ensure that any logic previously handled byuseAuthenticatedUser
is either no longer necessary or has been adequately refactored into other parts of the codebase.
- 27-33: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-62]
The changes made to the
useUser
function and the removal of theuseAuthenticatedUser
function appear to be well-integrated within the file. TheIfAuthenticated
andIfGuest
components, which rely on theuseUser
hook, should continue to function as expected. TheUserProvider
component, responsible for initializing the user context with session data, does not seem to be directly affected by these changes. Overall, the modifications contribute to simplifying and streamlining the authentication-related logic in the component, enhancing maintainability and readability.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- apps/web/src/components/poll-context.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/user-provider.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/src/utils/date-time-utils.ts (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- apps/web/src/components/poll-context.tsx
- apps/web/src/components/user-provider.tsx
- apps/web/src/utils/date-time-utils.ts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (4)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/poll/[urlId]/edit-options/page.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/poll/manage-poll/finalize-poll-dialog.tsx (4 hunks)
- apps/web/src/contexts/poll.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/src/utils/dayjs.tsx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/web/src/contexts/poll.tsx
Additional comments: 4
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/poll/[urlId]/edit-options/page.tsx (2)
- 19-28: The
convertOptionToString
function now correctly handles time zone conversions using thetimeZone
parameter. This is a significant improvement for handling date and time values in a user's local time zone or defaulting to UTC if no time zone is specified. However, ensure that all usages of this function throughout the codebase have been updated to include the newtimeZone
parameter to avoid potential issues with missing or incorrect arguments.- 93-102: The
onSubmit
function now correctly uses theconvertOptionToString
function with thetimeZone
parameter for comparison. This ensures that options are accurately compared and processed based on the user's specified time zone. It's important to thoroughly test this functionality, especially edge cases where time zone differences could affect the comparison logic.Verification successful
Given the task at hand and the limitations of the provided context, it's clear that further analysis of the codebase is necessary to verify the review comment's accuracy. Specifically, we need to examine the usage of the
convertOptionToString
function within theonSubmit
function, ensuring that thetimeZone
parameter is correctly utilized. Additionally, understanding how time zone differences are accounted for in the comparison logic is crucial. However, since the shell script output provided does not contribute to this verification, we will proceed with generating new verification scripts to examine the codebase further.
The verification process has confirmed that the
onSubmit
function correctly uses theconvertOptionToString
function with thetimeZone
parameter for comparison, as mentioned in the review comment. This ensures accurate processing of options based on the user's specified time zone. The advice to thoroughly test this functionality, especially considering edge cases involving time zone differences, is well-founded and supported by the evidence from the codebase.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Manual testing instructions for edge cases involving time zone differences. echo "Ensure manual testing covers scenarios where time zone differences could affect option comparison logic in the onSubmit function."Length of output: 268
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate the onSubmit function and verify the usage of convertOptionToString with the timeZone parameter rg "convertOptionToString\(.*data.timeZone.*\)" apps/web/src/app/\[locale\]/poll/\[urlId\]/edit-options/page.tsxLength of output: 249
apps/web/src/utils/dayjs.tsx (1)
- 220-225: The modification to the
adjustTimeZone
function to accept aDate
object and an optionallocalTime
parameter is a good approach for handling time zone adjustments more flexibly. This change allows for more precise control over time zone conversions, which can be particularly useful in applications dealing with multiple time zones. Ensure that all usages of this function have been updated to match the new signature and that the logic correctly handles both local and UTC time conversions.apps/web/src/components/poll/manage-poll/finalize-poll-dialog.tsx (1)
- 131-139: The use of the
adjustTimeZone
function fromuseDayjs
for handling time zone adjustments in theFinalizePollForm
component is a positive change, ensuring that start and end times are correctly adjusted based on the poll's time zone. This change enhances the accuracy of time-related information presented to the user. It's important to ensure that the logic correctly handles all scenarios, including polls without a specified time zone (defaulting to UTC) and polls with a specified time zone.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (4)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/poll/[urlId]/edit-options/page.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/poll/manage-poll/finalize-poll-dialog.tsx (4 hunks)
- apps/web/src/contexts/poll.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/utils/dayjs.tsx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/poll/[urlId]/edit-options/page.tsx
- apps/web/src/components/poll/manage-poll/finalize-poll-dialog.tsx
- apps/web/src/contexts/poll.tsx
- apps/web/src/utils/dayjs.tsx
Summary by CodeRabbit